Heritage Park of Katy Nursing and Rehabilitation
Katy, Texas · CCN 676221
36 surveys since 2010, 26 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 159
- Surveys
- 36
- Harm or worse
- 26
- Immediate jeopardy
- 18
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 118
- Ownership
- For profit - Individual
- Chain
- OAKBEND MEDICAL CENTER
- County
- Harris
- Medicare-certified since
- 2009
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jul 24, 2026
108 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.86 | 3.25 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.47 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 43.5% | 54.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $25,508 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J210.5% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1263.2% | E526.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7553×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F6091×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6281×
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Heritage Park of Katy Nursing and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF656Sep 30, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet each resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #50) - The facility failed to care plan Resident #50's risk and history of falls and to put interventions in place to prevent further falls. The care plan was not updated or revised after each fall. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 09/24/23 at 2:00 PM. While the IJ was removed on 09/26/23 at 4:32 AM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity of actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 30, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #50) reviewed for free of accidents, hazards, supervision, and devices., in that: 1. The facility failed to provide and utilize assistive devices for Resident #50 who had experienced multiple falls and unwitnessed fall on 7/25/23. Interventions including assistive devices were not put in place after a fall on 07/25/23 resulting in hospitalization and resident fell again on 07/26/23 resulting in a major head injury and another hospitalization 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Feb 19, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled drug counts were in order and reconciled for two of two medication carts observed during change-of-shift. -Two medication carts controlled medication counts were conducted without staff cross-checking the medications cards and controlled medication count sheets. -The staff did not state the name of the medication when calling out the resident name and quantity. -The facility policy did not require both staff to confirm the quantity being verbalized was the quantity written on the controlled medication count sheet. The failure placed residents at risk for controlled medications to not be available when needed, and for controlled drug diversion. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Nov 7, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen in that: -Five dented cans were stored with other cans used for resident meals in the dry storage room. -Food items were not sealed and not dated in the dry storage room. These failures could place residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: Observation on 11/5/24 at 9:00 am of the dry storage room revealed the following: -One 111 oz can of tomato paste with a large dent in the middle of the can -One 106 oz can of spaghetti sauce with a large dent at the top of the seam -One 112 oz can of banana pudding with a small dent at the bottom… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF690Mar 7, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1, and Resident #3) reviewed for incontinent care. - 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's foley tubing was not touching the floor while Resident #1 was propelling himself between the nursing station and medication room. - 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 3's foley bag and tubing were not touching the floor while Resident #2 was laid in bed. This failure could place residents at risk for pain, infection, injury, and hospitalization . Findings included: 1. […]
Read 44 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 44 of 159 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 24, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Feb 19, 2026Standard1 finding
- Nov 7, 2024Standard and complaint4 findings
- Mar 7, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Sep 30, 2023Standard and complaint11 findings · 2 harm
- Jul 22, 2022Standard3 findings
- Jun 24, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 7, 2021Complaint4 findings
Show the 28 earlier surveys
- Apr 2, 2021Standard1 finding
- Mar 5, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Sep 1, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Aug 21, 2019Complaint6 findings · 4 harm
- May 17, 2019Standard6 findings · 3 harm
- Apr 20, 2018Standard and complaint12 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 19, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Dec 6, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Sep 21, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 13, 2017Standard and complaint5 findings
- Mar 31, 2016Standard6 findings
- Sep 4, 2015Complaint5 findings · 4 harm
- Jun 29, 2015Complaint5 findings · 4 harm
- Jun 17, 2015Standard19 findings · 5 harm
- Feb 12, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Apr 16, 2014Standard and complaint11 findings
- Aug 1, 2013—2 findings
- Jul 23, 2013—1 finding
- Jun 4, 2013—1 finding
- May 22, 2013—10 findings
- Dec 20, 2012—1 finding
- Nov 20, 2012—2 findings
- Jun 8, 2012—10 findings
- Oct 14, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 11, 2011—1 finding
- Jun 9, 2011—9 findings
- Mar 24, 2011—2 findings
- Oct 29, 2010—2 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction