Heritage House Nursing and Rehabilitation
Rosebud, Texas · CCN 675210
24 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 93
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 15
- Immediate jeopardy
- 9
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 85
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE
- County
- Falls
- Medicare-certified since
- 1993
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 24, 2026
230 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Annual nurse turnover | 100.0% | 53.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $13,804 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J110.0% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D220.0% | E770.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5851×
Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
- F6441×
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
- F6571×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6921×
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Heritage House Nursing and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jan 31, 2024
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment remained free of accident hazards and a received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for (Resident #1) one resident reviewed for transfers. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was transferred properly as stated in the resident's care plan and MDS. An IJ was identified on 01/30/2024. The IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 06:16 p.m. While the facility was removed on 01/31/2024, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity with no actual harm due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure may put resident at risk for falls and injuries. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF585Jan 22, 2026
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt resolution of grievances regarding the resident's right to file a grievance for 3 of 3 confidential residents interviewed for grievances.1. The facility failed to notify residents in writing of the findings and actions of the grievances they filed. 2. The facility failed to have prominent postings of who the grievance official was.3. The facility failed to inform residents and their family groups of how to file an anonymous grievance. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jan 22, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. 1. The facility failed to properly label and/or date food items.2. The facility failed to dispose of expired food items. 3. The facility failed to correctly seal food items. 4. The facility failed to discard spoiled food items.These practices could cause foodborne illness or choking, particularly in a vulnerable population.Findings included:In an observation on 1/20/2026 at 9:00 AM of cooler 1 of 2 revealed the following:- Bacon in a zip top bag that was not labeled with an expiration date. - Celery that was brown, in a zip top bag dated 1-06 with no expiration date. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF644Oct 19, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer all level I residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #3, #24 and #29) assessments reviewed for PASARR evaluations. The facility failed to demonstrate a PASRR I was completed on Resident #03 and failed to refer her to the appropriate, State-designated authority when she was diagnosed with bipolar disorder. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Oct 19, 2024
Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's person-centered comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 2 (Resident #4, Resident # 28) of 8 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4)comprehensive care plan was updated when he quit smoking. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 28's comprehensive care plan reflected current physician orders for weights . These failures could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate or unnecessary interventions not individualized to their health care needs. […]
Read 33 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 33 of 93 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 24, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 22, 2026Standard2 findings
- Oct 19, 2024Standard4 findings
- Jul 3, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jan 31, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 30, 2023Standard1 finding
- Jun 10, 2022Standard2 findings
- Dec 23, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- Apr 1, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Mar 11, 2020Standard5 findings
- Apr 24, 2019Standard9 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 29, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Apr 26, 2018Standard5 findings
- Apr 21, 2017Standard17 findings · 6 harm
- Feb 24, 2016Standard3 findings
- Nov 19, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jun 22, 2015Complaint2 findings
- May 26, 2015Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
- Jan 26, 2015Standard10 findings · 3 harm
- Aug 15, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jan 10, 2014—11 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 18, 2012—3 findings
- Nov 3, 2011—5 findings
- Oct 13, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Farmersville Health and RehabilitationFarmersvilleno harm findings
- Golden Years Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterMarlin1 harm finding
- Legacies Nursing and RehabilitationHemphillno harm findings
- Yorktown Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterYorktown1 harm finding
- Crockett Health Care Associates, Inc.Crockettno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction