Heritage Grove Estates
Topeka, Kansas · CCN 175171
21 surveys since 2010, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 108
- Surveys
- 21
- Harm or worse
- 8
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 80
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Shawnee
- Medicare-certified since
- 1988
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 43 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Kansas.
Last survey on record
Jul 22, 2026
110 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.03 | 3.56 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.60 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 53.5% | 52.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $9,113 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J13.3% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G26.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1756.7% | E620.0% | F310.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C13.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F7582×
Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6071×
Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Heritage Grove Estates, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jan 29, 2025
The facility identified a census of 64 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for cognately impaired Resident (R)1, a resident with a risk for elopement and falls, to prevent an elopement. On 01/26/25, R1 self-propelled in his wheelchair down a hallway to a locked door with a keypad. The door was not latched and R1 left the unit and proceeded out a set of double doors that exited the building. When R1 opened the double doors, an alarm sounded at the nurse ' s station, but the staff turned the alarm off without checking the door. Per interview and investigation, R1 exited the facility building at 05:58 AM and entered the Assisted Living (AL) building at 07:02 AM. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Feb 2, 2023
The facility identified a census of 56 residents. The sample included 14 residents with two residents reviewed for pressure injuries. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure preventive measures were in place for Resident (R)40 who developed a facility acquired pressure injury to his coccyx (small triangular bone at the base of the spine) area and further failed to implement treatment orders, and routinely monitor the wound. R40's pressure injury evolved into a stage three (full thickness, extending into tissue beneath the skin) pressure ulcer. The facility further failed to ensure preventive measures were in place for R32 who developed a pressure injury to her left heel and further failed to monitor the wound routinely. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 2, 2023
The facility reported a census of 56 residents. The sample included 14 residents with seven residents reviewed for accidents/hazards. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility to ensure Resident (R)41 remained free from avoidable accidents when staff left R41, who required one-to-one assistance, alone in the bathroom to perform hygiene tasks, which resulted in a fall for R41. As a result, R41 sustained a cut to the back of her head which required emergent treatment and surgical staples to close the wound. The facility further failed to identify and implement appropriate interventions, investigate for causal factors, and follow residents' plan of care to prevent avoidable accidents and falls. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF730Jul 22, 2026
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of performance reviews. This placed the residents at risk of impaired care. Findings included:- The facility's employment records documented nine nurse aides were employed at the facility for at least one year. The facility's in-service records documented that 2 of those nurses' aides reviewed had not completed in service education on the outcome of performance reviews for competencies. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jul 22, 2026
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when staff failed to sanitize multi-resident use equipment between resident use. Staff also failed to utilize adequate infection control measures when providing urinary catheter care for Resident (R) 15. The facility also failed to establish a water management program to prevent the growth of Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium which can cause pneumonia in vulnerable populations) and other water-borne pathogens. Findings included:- 1. On 07/20/2026 at 02:00 PM, observation revealed R15 sat in a wheelchair in the family area by the nurses' station. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 108 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 22, 2026Standard and complaint12 findings
- Jan 29, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 7, 2024Standard5 findings
- Feb 2, 2023Complaint7 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 18, 2021Standard5 findings
- Jun 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Nov 7, 2019Standard1 finding
- Sep 11, 2018Standard5 findings
Show the 13 earlier surveys
- Jun 6, 2017Standard4 findings
- Sep 27, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Oct 27, 2015Standard and complaint9 findings
- Aug 20, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Mar 27, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jul 16, 2014Standard and complaint9 findings
- Jun 5, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 4, 2013—10 findings
- Jan 23, 2013—2 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 19, 2012—2 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 14, 2011—12 findings
- Dec 1, 2010—2 findings
- Sep 1, 2010—17 findings · 2 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction