Henry County Health and Rehabilitation Facility
Abbeville, Alabama · CCN 015373
10 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 40
- Surveys
- 10
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 142
- Ownership
- Government - County
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Henry
- Medicare-certified since
- 1980
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=3, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Feb 4, 2022
1,739 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.02 | 4.00 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.72 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 43.6% | 43.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D872.7% | E— | F218.2% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C19.1% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6411×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F7001×
Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Henry County Health and Rehabilitation Facility, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF700Feb 4, 2022
Based on observations, interviews, resident record review, and the facility's Proper Use of Side Rails policy, the facility failed to perform ongoing assessments for the use of side rails for Resident Identifier (RI) #7 to ensure the side rails used met RI #7's needs. This deficient practice affected RI #7, one of one resident reviewed for side rail use. Findings included: The facility admitted Resident Identifier (RI) #7 on 03/17/2014. A review of RI #7's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed severe cognitive impairment. Per the MDS, RI #7 required one-person extensive physical assistance with bed mobility and full staff performance of transfers. The MDS indicated the resident did not walk during the assessment period and did not use a bed rail. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF758Feb 4, 2022
Based on resident record review, interviews, and review of the facility's Antipsychotic Medication Use policy, the facility's Behavior Assessment and Monitoring policy, and the facility's Depression - Clinical Protocol policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #31, was monitored for behaviors for which antipsychotic medication was administered and the facility further failed to ensure RI #31 and RI #47 were monitored for side effects of [CONDITION(S)] medications to include: antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. This affected two of 4 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications who received antipsychotic and antidepressant medication. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF759Feb 4, 2022
Based on observation, resident record review, interviews, and review of the facility's Administering Medication policy, the facility's Administration of Metered-Dose Inhaler policy, and manufacturer's instructions for use, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. The facility had a medication error rate of 9.38%, which resulted from three errors in 32 opportunities and affected Resident Identifier (RI) #52 one of five residents observed receiving medications during the medication administration observation on 02/03/2022. Sixty-nine residents resided in the facility.Findings included: The facility's Administering Medications policy and procedure, dated 02/2014, indicated, . […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 40 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 4, 2022Standard3 findings
- May 16, 2019Standard3 findings
- Jun 14, 2018Standard5 findings
- May 4, 2017Standard2 findings
- Mar 31, 2016Standard5 findings
- Feb 26, 2015Standard4 findings
- Jul 12, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 20, 2013—3 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
- May 10, 2012—3 findings
- Apr 7, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction