Deficiency Index

Haven Convalescent Home, Inc

New Castle, Pennsylvania · CCN 396106

10 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
25
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
91
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Lawrence
Medicare-certified since
2007

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Dec 13, 2024

696 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.523.54
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.48—
Annual nurse turnover30.6%46.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD—E1100.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 1 of the 25 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Haven Convalescent Home, Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Dec 13, 2024

    Based on a review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control practices regarding enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during observation of a wound and foley catheter (tubing inserted into the bladder to drain urine) for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident R78). Findings include: No facility policy on EBP provided. Resident R78's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), anemia (low red blood cells in the blood which carries oxygen), hyperlipidemia (high levels of fats-cholesterol and triglycerides in the blood), and dementia (a disease affecting mood, behavior and… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761May 7, 2021

    Based on observations, review of facility policies and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medications were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents for two of three medication carts observed during medication pass. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Storage of Drugs and Biologicals Policy Updated 1/2020, revealed that all drug and biologicals are to be stored in locked compartments under proper temperature control. Only licensed nursing personnel are permitted access to this area and permitted to have keys for the locked drugs and biologicals. Observation of medication pass on 5/4/21, at 1:28 p.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF836May 7, 2021

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, Title 49. Professional and Vocational Standards, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assure that a Registered Nurse (RN) conducted and documented a comprehensive resident wound assessment for one of five residents reviewed with wounds (Resident R5). Findings include: The Title 49. Professional and Vocational Standards, Department of State Chapter 21, State Board of Nursing, dated 1/15/05, indicated that under Responsibilities of the RN, 21.11, General Functions. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880May 7, 2021

    Based on observations, review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement measures to prevent the potential for cross contamination (transfer of germs from one location to another) during a dressing change for one of two residents (Resident R5) observed for wound care. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Wound Care Procedure for Major Wounds, dated 12/02/20, indicated that staff are to wash their hands and apply clean gloves prior to wound care, following the removal of a soiled dressing and prior to cleaning the wound, and change gloves prior to applying the clean dressing. Resident R5's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE], with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 25 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 13, 2024Standard1 finding
  • May 7, 2021Standard3 findings
  • Nov 22, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Oct 25, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Nov 13, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Oct 20, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Nov 25, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Oct 16, 2014Standard1 finding
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Oct 19, 2012—3 findings
  • Nov 10, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction