Hattiesburg Health & Rehab Center
Hattiesburg, Mississippi · CCN 255321
14 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 52
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 164
- Ownership
- For profit - Partnership
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Forrest
- Medicare-certified since
- 2007
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Dec 11, 2025
333 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.83 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.59 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 63.5% | 47.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,021 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J111.1% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D777.8% | E111.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Hattiesburg Health & Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jan 5, 2024
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect a resident (Resident #1) from sexual abuse by another resident (Resident #2) for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1 The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision and monitoring allowed Resident #2 to be in his room with his pants unzipped and penis exposed with Resident #1, who was a cognitively impaired and vulnerable person, in his bed with her clothing pulled down exposing her genital area. This placed Resident #1 and other vulnerable residents in a situation likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 12/21/23 when Resident #2 exhibited inappropriate sexual behaviors. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Dec 11, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to a comfortable living environment by not ensuring comfortable room and water temperatures for residents across three (3) of four (4) halls in the facility, Halls A, B, and C.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Quality of Life - Homelike Environment, revised 5/2017, revealed, .Residents are to be provided with a.comfortable and homelike environment.Policy Interpretation and Implementation.2. The facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include.h. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF628Dec 11, 2025
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide complete and timely written transfer notices for six (6) of six (6) residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents #1, #9, #10, #12, #14, and #15). The facility did not include a clear, resident-specific reason for why each resident was sent to the hospital. Written notices were provided late for five (5) residents (Residents #1, #10, #12, and #15), and the Responsible Representative for one (1) resident (Resident #14) did not receive a written notification of the transfer at all.Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Transfer or Discharge Notice revised November 2023, revealed, .Policy Interpretation and Implementation.4. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF645Dec 11, 2025
Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's diagnosis of a major mental illness was accurately identified on the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) at the time of admission for one (1) of twenty-nine (29) sampled residents, Resident #11.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy admission Criteria revised December 2016, revealed . Our facility will admit only those residents whose medical and nursing care needs can be met. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The objectives of our admission criteria policy are to: . e. assure that the facility receives appropriate medical . records . 8. Nursing and medical needs of individuals with mental disorders . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF640Sep 26, 2024
Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to transmit MDS assessments within 14 days of completion for (10) of (52) sampled residents. (Resident #3, Resident #48, Resident #52, Resident #54, Resident #81, Resident #96, Resident #98, Resident #102, Resident #116, and Resident # 134). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, revised 9/2019, revealed, .The facility follows Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual from Centers of Medicare and Medicaid services (CMS) for all Residents .Assessment Timing (will follow the RAI manual guidelines) . Record review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual dated October 2019 revealed . Transmitting Data: . […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 52 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 11, 2025Standard3 findings
- Sep 26, 2024Standard3 findings
- Jan 5, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 13, 2022Standard2 findings
- Dec 2, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jul 12, 2019Standard8 findings
- May 24, 2018Standard2 findings
- Feb 3, 2017Standard6 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Nov 19, 2015Standard6 findings
- Dec 18, 2014Standard5 findings
- Jan 17, 2014—2 findings
- Nov 26, 2013—1 finding
- Dec 20, 2012—5 findings
- Sep 16, 2011—7 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction