Harmony Pointe Care Center
Lakewood, Colorado · CCN 065298
21 surveys since 2010, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 115
- Surveys
- 21
- Harm or worse
- 8
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 125
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- LONG PEAK OPERATING COMPANY
- County
- Jefferson
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 48 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Colorado.
Last survey on record
Sep 26, 2024
774 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.12 | 3.30 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.68 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 29.2% | 44.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G38.8% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2058.8% | E1132.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5612×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Harmony Pointe Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF686May 9, 2023
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#92) of three residents reviewed for pressure injuries out of 29 sample residents remained free from worsening of a pressure injury. Resident #92, was admitted on [DATE] for short term rehabilitation with a goal to return home. The resident was admitted to the facility without any skin conditions. The resident had a fall on 4/5/23 in which he sustained a right hip fracture. In addition, the resident had a subsequent fall on 4/20/23 in which he refractured his right hip around the periprosthetic (structure in close relation to an implant), a distal femur fracture (fractures of the thigh bone that occur just above the knee joint) and nondisplaced left superior pubic fracture (a break in one of the bones that make up… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 9, 2023
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#92) of six residents reviewed for accidents out of 29 sample residents remained as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident #92, was initially admitted for short term rehabilitation on 2/28/23 with a goal to return home. He was identified as a high fall risk and as a high elopement risk upon admission. The resident had numerous predisposing factors which included: dementia, confusion and poor safety awareness. The facility failed to develop, communicate and implement effective interventions to prevent the resident from: eloping on one occasion and falling seven times within a period of two months. The resident sustained major injuries from two out of seven falls which led to hospitalization . […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 7, 2022
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four (#66, #70, #29 and #50) of six residents reviewed for accidents out of 35 sample residents remained as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident #66, who was identified as a high fall risk, had numerous predisposing factors which included dementia, confusion, unsafe sleeping habits, and poor safety awareness. The facility failed to develop, communicate and implement effective interventions to prevent the resident from falling on multiple occasions. Due to the facility's failures, the resident sustained an acute distal ulna fracture to her left wrist subsequent to a fall on 1/18/22 requiring hospital treatment for trauma to the left wrist and pain. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Mar 3, 2021
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (#1 and #4) of three residents reviewed out of 11 sample residents were kept free from abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was kept free from resident-to-resident abuse by Resident #4. Resident #4 who had a known history of verbal aggression toward others was not provided the necessary tools and behavioral interventions when she expressed she was unhappy with her roommate (Resident #5) on multiple occasions over a six month period of time. Furthermore, the facility failed to determine the root cause of Resident #4 frustration with Resident #5 and provide intervention to prevent a potentially abusive incident from occurring. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF567Sep 26, 2024
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure that residents personal funds accounts were managed adequately for the facility and accessible to the residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to access their personal funds accounts on the weekend. Findings include: I. Resident interviews Resident #27 was interviewed on 9/23/24 at 11:48 a.m. Resident #27 said she could only access her personal funds account when the lady in the front office was in the facility. Resident #27 said she could not get money from her personal funds account on the weekends. Resident #16 was interviewed on 9/26/24 at 11:32 a.m. Resident #16 said residents could not get money from their personal funds account on the weekends. […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 115 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 26, 2024Standard17 findings
- May 9, 2023Standard and complaint11 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 28, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Feb 7, 2022Standard6 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 3, 2021Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- May 6, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jan 8, 2020Complaint4 findings
- Dec 10, 2019Standard5 findings · 2 harm
Show the 13 earlier surveys
- Nov 1, 2018Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jul 18, 2018Complaint2 findings
- May 24, 2017Standard6 findings
- Feb 24, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jun 29, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Mar 30, 2016Standard11 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 4, 2015Standard12 findings
- Mar 20, 2014Standard3 findings
- Nov 14, 2013—1 finding
- Apr 30, 2013—10 findings
- Nov 29, 2012—4 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 19, 2012—5 findings
- Sep 2, 2010—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction