Deficiency Index

Hampton Place Healthcare, LLC

Rogers, Arkansas · CCN 045476

2 surveys since 2024, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
10
Surveys
2
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2024–2026
’24’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Citations on record10

Across 2 surveys carrying at least one finding.

The facility

Certified beds
140
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS
County
Benton
Medicare-certified since
2023

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 30, 2026

102 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.873.82
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.33—
Annual nurse turnover60.1%49.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD240.0%E360.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 5 of the 10 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Hampton Place Healthcare, LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 30, 2026

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of one kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff properly restrained hair in the kitchen; and dietary staff washed their hands and used gloves properly. The findings included: During an observation in the kitchen on 07/29/2026 at 11:00 AM, [NAME] #13, Dietary Aide (DA) #14, DA #15, DA #16, [NAME] #17 and [NAME] # 18 did not have their hair fully restrained by a hair net. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF600Jul 30, 2026

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on review of video footage, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #57) of three residents were free from physical abuse and mental anguish. The findings included: Review of Resident #57's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 05/15/2026, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 06 which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #57 was independent for all mobility, personal care and dressing needs, and refused showers/baths. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Dec 12, 2024

    50923 Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately completed for 2 (Resident #56 and Resident #61) of 2 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure information regarding the resident's hearing was accurately completed for Resident #56, and Resident # 61 was inaccurately coded for hospice services. The findings are: A review of the Order Summary dated December 2024, indicated the facility admitted Resident #56 with diagnoses of fracture of left femur, urinary tract infection (UTI), and history of falls. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Dec 12, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the freezer were covered and sealed; 1 of 2 ice machines were maintained in clean and sanitary condition; expired food items were promptly removed, and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items for 2 of 2 meals observed. The findings are: 1. On [DATE] at 1:22 PM, the following observations were made in the walk-in freezer. a. An opened box of fish. The box was not covered or sealed. b. An opened box of breaded chicken. The box was not cover or sealed. 2. On [DATE] at 1:27 PM, the following observations were made in the kitchen area. a. An opened bottle of lemon juice was on a shelf above the food preparation counter with an expiration date of [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Jul 30, 2026

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's Power of Attorney (POA) was notified of a medication change for one (Resident #45) of one resident reviewed.The findings include: Review of Resident #45's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #45 on 06/29/2026 with diagnoses which included Parkinson's Disease. Resident #45's family member was listed as the POA for care and emergency contact #1. Review of Resident #45's admission Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/06/2026 revealed the resident had a Brief interview of Mental Status score of 9 which indicated that Resident #45 had moderate cognitive impairment. […]

Read all 10 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 30, 2026Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Dec 12, 2024Standard3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction