Hampton Oaks Health Campus
Scottsburg, Indiana · CCN 155753
20 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 79
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 71
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES
- County
- Scott · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2006
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=13, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jun 3, 2026
159 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.03 | 3.49 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.00 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.0% | 48.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D120.0% | E360.0% | F120.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Hampton Oaks Health Campus, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Oct 20, 2021
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor for skin changes, follow physician's orders and interventions to prevent the development and worsening of pressure ulcers for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents 47 and 27) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 47 was reviewed on 10/12/21 at 2:01 p.m. The diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The MDS (Minimum Data Set) Quarterly assessment, dated 9/17/21, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The care plan, dated 1/31/20 and revised on 9/21/21, indicated the resident was at risk for skin breakdown related to decreased mobility, history of pressure ulcer to right knee, multiple comorbidities, and [CONDITION(S)]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 9, 2024
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner for 4 of 4 observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 65 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings include: 1. During the initial tour of the kitchen on 1/2/24 between 9:10 a.m. and 9:40 a.m. while accompanied by the Director of Food Service, the following concerns were observed: - The shelf below the steamer had a dinner plate size brown puddle on it along with tan food particles. - The top of the dishwasher had a heavy soil of brown and yellow food crumbs and grease. - The grill slats had a heavy coat of dried black crust on them with black crumbs on the tray in front of the grill. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF602Dec 18, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure misappropriation of resident property did not occur for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B, Resident C, Resident D, Resident E, Resident G and Resident F)Findings include:1.The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 12/17/25 at 3:05 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia without behavioral disturbance, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic pain syndrome, depression and anxiety. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Jan 9, 2024
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 6 residents or responsible parties were provided written notice of Transfer/Discharge upon transfer to an acute care facility. (Residents 9, 67, 21, 12, and 272) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 9 was reviewed on 1/8/24 at 9:08 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, altered mental status, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, acute systolic (congestive) heart failure, fluid overload, and acute pulmonary edema. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF625Jan 9, 2024
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 6 residents or responsible parties were provided written notice of and signed the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to an acute care facility. (Residents 9, 67, 21, 12, and 272) Findings include: 1. A nurse's note, dated 10/21/23 at 1:55 p.m., indicated Resident 9 was observed to have a change in condition with increased confusion and lethargy. The physician was notified and new orders were received to transfer the resident to the hospital emergency room . […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 79 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 3, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 18, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 9, 2024Standard3 findings
- Dec 20, 2022Standard3 findings
- Oct 20, 2021Standard5 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 18, 2019Standard3 findings
- Mar 11, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jul 19, 2018Standard5 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- Jun 25, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 24, 2017Standard3 findings
- Apr 20, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Sep 1, 2016Standard4 findings
- Sep 16, 2015Standard2 findings
- Sep 23, 2014Standard6 findings
- Aug 20, 2013—9 findings
- Jun 10, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 19, 2012—14 findings
- Jan 19, 2012—6 findings
- May 31, 2011—1 finding
- Apr 8, 2011—9 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction