Gunnison Valley Health Senior Care Center
Gunnison, Colorado · CCN 065144
17 surveys since 2011, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 72
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 50
- Ownership
- Government - City/county
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Gunnison · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1977
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jan 29, 2026
284 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.13 | 4.45 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.12 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 45.7% | 42.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $14,866 across 3 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G225.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D337.5% | E337.5% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Gunnison Valley Health Senior Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Apr 2, 2024
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) out of three sample residents were kept free from abuse. The facility failed to provide increased oversight and monitoring to ensure Resident #1, who had severe cognitive impairment and was unable to consent to sexual contact of any type, was protected from sexual abuse by Resident #2, who was cognitively intact. On 2/13/24, Resident #2 was observed watching television in Resident #1's room by two different staff members. At 9:23 p.m., over an hour after the last known observation of the two residents, certified nurse aide (CNA) #1 entered Resident #1's room while doing routine rounds. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Jan 29, 2026
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for five (#24, #17, #3, #14 and #28) of 10 residents reviewed for respect and dignity out of 22 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #24, Resident #17, Resident #3, Resident #14 and Resident #28, who required meal assistance were treated with respect and dignity. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Resident Dignity and Respect policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/28/26 at 2:53 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF727Apr 24, 2024
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have a registered nurse (RN) scheduled eight hours consecutively every day for seven days a week. Specifically, the facility failed to have an RN on duty for eight consecutive hours consistently from 10/1/23 to 4/24/24. Findings include: I. Record review Review of the nursing schedule from 10/1/23 to 4/24/24 revealed the following: -In October 2023, the facility did not have an RN on duty for eight consecutive hours on three days during the month; -In November 2023, the facility did not have an RN on duty for eight consecutive hours on thirteen days during the month; -In December 2023, the facility did not have an RN on duty for eight consecutive hours on three days during the month; and, -In March 2024, the facility did not… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF759Jan 29, 2026
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent (%). Specifically, the facility's medication error rate was 6.25%, with two errors out of 32 opportunities for error. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Facility Administration of Medication policy, last revised 3/12/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/30/26 at 8:49 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Qualified, authorized staff members do the following prior to administering medications: Obtain medication orders from a licensed practitioner as permitted by law and regulation. Review all medication orders in a timely manner. Clarify the order with the prescriber, if necessary. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 72 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 29, 2026Standard2 findings
- Apr 24, 2024Standard1 finding
- Apr 2, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 4, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Mar 12, 2020Standard4 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 7, 2019Standard3 findings
- Sep 14, 2017Standard5 findings
- Jul 28, 2016Standard15 findings · 1 harm
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Mar 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Sep 29, 2015Standard8 findings
- Jan 7, 2015Standard1 finding
- Nov 6, 2014Standard9 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 3, 2013—4 findings
- Jul 10, 2013—3 findings
- Nov 15, 2012—6 findings
- Nov 30, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 20, 2011—7 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction