Deficiency Index

Groesbeck LTC Nursing and Rehabilitation

Groesbeck, Texas · CCN 676071

17 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
38
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
90
Ownership
Government - Hospital district
Chain
GULF COAST LTC PARTNERS
County
Limestone · rural
Medicare-certified since
2005

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=19, floor 20).

Last survey on record

May 22, 2025

536 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.393.24
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.15—
Annual nurse turnover38.9%54.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD466.7%E—F233.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 6 of the 38 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6441×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Groesbeck LTC Nursing and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 28, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in the facility's kitchen for one out of one ice machines. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was free of mold. This failure placed the residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings included: Observation on 3/26/2024 at 09:02 am of the only ice machine had pink and black residue on the outside of the internal plastic covering over the ice drop, the level of ice was up to the bottom edge of covering. Observation on 3/26/2024 at 12:30 pm of ice machine after cleaning faint pink coloring remains, no black residue present on the internal plastic covering over the ice drop. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 26, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. A. The facility failed to sanitize the oven, walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer located in the kitchen. B. The facility failed to properly store and label food in the facility's walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer. C. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide B wore a beard net when removing clean plates from the dishwasher and Dietary Aide C properly wore a hair net when placing residents' breakfast plates on the meal tray cart. D. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Jul 30, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 3 housekeeping carts (Housekeeping Cart #1) and for 2 of 8 tables (Table 6 and Table 5) reviewed for hazards. The facility failed to ensure HSK did not leave keys accessible on an unsupervised Housekeeping Cart #1 with cleaning chemicals inside the compartments. The facility failed to ensure that dining room furnishings (Table 6 and Table 5) were structurally sound, stable and safe, having the potential to affect all residents who use the main dining area for meals or activities. This failure could place residents at risk of injuries, illness, and hospitalization. Findings included: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF760Jul 30, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 5 of 7 residents (Resident # 22, Resident #37, Resident #23, Resident #2, and Resident #27) reviewed for medication errors.The facility failed to ensure MA D followed ordered BP parameters for administration of Atenolol Oral Tablet 50 MG (treating high blood pressure) ordered by physician for Resident #22. MA D failed to notify charge nurse to recheck BP for Resident #22 and hold administration of medication on 07/23/2026, 7/24/2026, and 7/28/2026. The facility failed to ensure MA D followed BP parameters ordered for administration of Lisinopril Oral Tablet 20 MG (treating high blood pressure) ordered by physician for Resident #37. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jul 30, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchen in the facility. The facility did not ensure that unopened packages of meat that were taken out of the original box had a date on it. The facility did not ensure that the floors in the walk-in refrigerator and the walk-in freezer were free of debris. These failures could place all residents who eat prepared food in the kitchen at risk of foodborne illnesses.Findings included: Observation on 07/28/2026 at 9:32 AM of the freezer revealed the following:There were food particles and a sticky substance on the floor underneath the bottom shelf of the freezer. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 38 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 30, 2026Standard8 findings
  • May 22, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Apr 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 28, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Jan 26, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Sep 23, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 29, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 28, 2021Standard2 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Oct 11, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 7, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Apr 2, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 7, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Feb 27, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Jan 29, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 13, 2013—2 findings
  • Feb 2, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 11, 2011—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction