Gregston Nursing Home, Inc.
Marlow, Oklahoma · CCN 375425
14 surveys since 2013, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 34
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 96
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Stephens · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2003
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Aug 22, 2025
444 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.20 | 3.65 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.24 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 54.5% | 55.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D233.3% | E466.7% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Gregston Nursing Home, Inc., in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Aug 22, 2025
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for residents who required staff assistance for eating for 7 (#2, 3, 31, 34, 44, 47, and #52) of 7 sampled residents observed during dining.The DON reported three residents were dependent on staff for eating. Findings:On 08/19/25 at 12:21 p.m., CNA #1 was observed standing up to feed and assist Residents #31, #44, #47, and #52 at the feeding assist table on the East side of the dining room. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Aug 22, 2025
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all meals were served from the kitchen at an appetizing temperature. The DON reported 54 residents received meals from the kitchen. Findings: A significant change assessment, dated 08/10/25, showed Resident #64's cognition was intact with a BIMs score of 15. The assessment showed the resident was independent with eating. On 08/20/25 at 11:00 a.m., the resident council meeting minutes were reviewed for July 2025. The minutes showed complaints related to cold food. On 08/19/25 at 11:40 a.m., Resident #64 reported the food was served cold a lot. The resident reported this weekend (08/16/25 and 08/17/25) all meals were cold and had to have their soup sent back three times to get it hot enough. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Aug 22, 2025
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper infection control practice while assisting residents with eating for 3 (#2, 3, and #34) of 7 residents observed during dining. The DON reported three residents were dependent on staff assistance for eating. Findings:On 08/19/25 at 12:25 p.m., CNA #2 was observed assisting Residents #2, #3, and #34 with eating. CNA #2 was observed blowing on Residents #34's spoon of beans to cool them off before feeding the resident. CNA #2 was observed touching their face and hair, then picking up a pepper with their bare hands and feeding it to Resident #34. CNA #2 was observed touching Resident #3's arm to arouse the resident to eat and then assisting Resident #2 with eating from a spoon. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Jan 13, 2023
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments accurately reflected the residents status for three (#17, 43, and #45) of eighteen sampled residents reviewed for assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 52 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #17 had diagnoses which included dementia, fractures, and diabetes. An incident report, dated 12/04/22, documented the resident had a fall with right femur fracture. The Significant Change Assessment, dated 12/19/22, documented under the section for Fall History Did the resident have a fall any time in the last month It was answered, No. On 01/08/23 at 9:30 a.m., the MDS coordinator reported, I should have marked the resident had a fall as yes not no. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF645Jan 13, 2023
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a preadmission screening to determine the need for a PASRR II for one (#43) of one sampled resident admitted to the facility. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented 52 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A .Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Nursing Facility Level of Care Assessment, dated 06/17/22, read in parts, .admitted [DATE] .Level II required [blank] .Diagnosis of a serious mental illness (for example schizophrenic, paranoid, panic, mood or other severe anxiety or depressive disorder, somatoform disorder, personality disorder, or other psychotic disorder, or another mental disorder, or another mental disorder that may lead to a chronic disability? [No] . […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 34 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 22, 2025Standard3 findings
- Jan 13, 2023Standard3 findings
- Nov 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Aug 6, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Mar 21, 2019Standard5 findings
- Jul 17, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Nov 21, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Mar 6, 2017Standard4 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Jan 14, 2016Standard1 finding
- Jun 11, 2015Complaint5 findings
- Nov 21, 2014Standard1 finding
- Dec 4, 2013—4 findings
- Sep 4, 2013—1 finding
- Jan 11, 2013—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction