Deficiency Index

Greenwood Transitional Rehabilitation Unit

Greenwood, South Carolina · CCN 425388

9 surveys since 2012, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
24
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2012–2024
’12’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
12
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Greenwood · rural
Medicare-certified since
2008

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jun 6, 2024

886 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day6.344.05
Registered-nurse hours per resident day2.57—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 24 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Greenwood Transitional Rehabilitation Unit, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Jun 6, 2024

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect in a timely manner for one of one resident (Resident (R) 61) reviewed for neglect out of a total sample of 11 residents. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care. Findings include: Review of the Abuse, Assault, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property - Victims of policy, revised 06/2019 and provided by the facility, revealed, abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishments, with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. This includes staff neglect or indifference to the infliction of injury or intimidation of one resident by another. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF623Jun 6, 2024

    Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident (R) 9) reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 11 was given a written notice prior to transfer to the hospital. This failure created the potential for residents or their responsible party to not have the information needed to understand their transfer to the hospital. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Right to Notification of Changes, revised 06/18, revealed To provide for notification of changes related to residents as outlined by federal and state regulations. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF625Jun 6, 2024

    Based on record review interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident (R) 9) reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 11 residents was given a written copy of a bed hold notice prior to or within 24-hours of emergency transfer to the hospital. This failure created the potential for resident and responsible party to not have the information needed to safeguard their return to the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility document titled, ''Discharge/Transfer Notice,'' revised 06/10/19, revealed .''Notice of bed hold: Your bed will be held for two midnights following transfer to acute care, in case you become medically stable and appropriate to return to skilled nursing care within the two-midnight period. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Jun 1, 2022

    Based on observations, interviews, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident(R) 14) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care received services in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, R14's oxygen tubing was not labeled and R14's continuous positive airway pressure ([CONDITION(S)]) was not covered. Findings include: Review of R14's undated Face Sheet provided by the facility, indicated R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 24 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 6, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jun 1, 2022Standard1 finding
  • May 8, 2019Standard3 findings
  • May 17, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Aug 9, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Apr 15, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Jun 12, 2014Standard2 findings
  • May 7, 2013—3 findings
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • Jun 12, 2012—4 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction