Deficiency Index

Greenwood House Home for the Jewish Aged

Trenton, New Jersey · CCN 315215

16 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
52
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
137
Ownership
Non profit - Church related
Chain
Independent
County
Mercer
Medicare-certified since
1985

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 184 facilities with 128 or more beds in New Jersey.

Last survey on record

Mar 26, 2026

228 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.824.41
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.68—
Annual nurse turnover41.5%30.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$323,570 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L28.7%
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1773.9%E28.7%F28.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 52 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F7002×

    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.

  • F7552×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Greenwood House Home for the Jewish Aged, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF600Aug 21, 2024

    PART A NJ Complaint #: 174306 Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their abuse policies and procedures by ensuring a resident (Resident #171) was free from verbal abuse and an involuntary restraint by: a.) immediately suspending the Registered Nurse (RN #1) and Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) who the allegation was made against pending a thorough investigation; and b.) thoroughly investigating an allegation of verbal abuse and involuntary restraint. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF610Aug 21, 2024

    NJ Complaint #: 174306 Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of verbal abuse and involuntary restraint for a resident (Resident #171) who informed the facility that the Registered Nurse (RN #1) and Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) verbally abused them and placed a chair on the side of their bed preventing the resident from using the restroom. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 171); and two staff members (RN #1 and CNA #1) who had access to all the residents in the facility on 3 of 3 nursing units, reviewed for abuse. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 26, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen utensils were stored in a clean and sanitary manner. These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illness for 101 out of 106 residents who received meals prepared in the facility (five residents received nutrition via feeding tubes). Findings include:1. During the initial kitchen inspection, completed with the Dietary Manager (DM) and Executive Chef (EC) on 03/23/26 at 10:18 AM, the following concerns were noted: a. In a bin of serving utensils (spoons and scoops), the handle of one serving spoon was covered with a white substance on the handle. The DM stated the white substance was mayonnaise. b. On the three-compartment sink's metal counter were four out of 13 full sheet trays stacked wet. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Mar 26, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene when moving between rooms, including one with enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), creating a risk for cross-contamination. Additionally, the facility failed to process laundry in a clean and sanitary manner and did not ensure laundry staff consistently washed their hands. This failure has the potential to spread infection among the facility's 106 residents. Findings include:1. On 03/23/26 at 3:13 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 was observed entering and exiting multiple resident rooms and touching surfaces in the rooms without washing or sanitizing his/her hands between residents' rooms. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Mar 26, 2026

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that food was served at the correct temperature for two residents who received hamburgers (Residents (R) 19 and 90) and food served was palatable in taste for two residents (R 70 and R135). Specifically, the facility did not ensure that dietary staff followed appropriate processes to prepare and serve food palatable for 101 out of census of 106 residents during meal service. This failure had the potential to place residents at increased risk for meal dissatisfaction and the service of potentially unsafe food. Findings include: 1. Review of R70's undated Face Sheet provided by the facility indicated R70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 52 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 26, 2026Standard8 findings
  • Aug 21, 2024Standard and complaint13 findings · 4 harm
  • Mar 7, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 12, 2022Standard4 findings
  • Jun 5, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 1, 2020Standard3 findings
  • Apr 25, 2019Standard3 findings
  • May 4, 2018Standard4 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Mar 13, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Jul 11, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 4, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Mar 20, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Apr 30, 2013—2 findings
  • Apr 10, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 22, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction