Greenville Health and Rehabilitation Center

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Greenville Health and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

• Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF580Jul 24, 2026

  Based on record review and interviews with staff, Physicians and Nurse Practitioners (NP), the facility failed to notify and consult with a medical provider for new onset and continued vomiting and when bolus tube feedings (liquid formula is administered through a feeding tube into the stomach in larger volumes over a short period) were held for a severely cognitively impaired resident with a diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (disruption in normal brain function caused by an external mechanical force) who received all fluid and caloric intake through tube feedings. Resident #145 had an acute vomiting episode on [DATE] (Friday) before 6:00 AM, and the 6:00 AM bolus feeding was held. The medical provider was not notified of the vomiting or that the bolus tube feeding was being held. […]

• Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF693Jul 24, 2026

  Based on record review and interviews with staff, Physicians and Nurse Practitioners (NP), the facility failed to identify the seriousness of new onset and continued vomiting, complete and document ongoing comprehensive nursing assessments of the residents condition or identify the urgent need for medical attention for a severely cognitively impaired resident with a diagnosis of traumatic brain injury who received all fluid and caloric intake through bolus tube feedings six times a day. Resident #145 had an acute vomiting episode on [DATE] and the 6:00 AM bolus feeding was held. Nursing staff provided three scheduled bolus tube feedings on [DATE] before the 10:00 PM bolus tube feeding was held due to vomiting. […]

• Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 11, 2025

  2. Resident #85 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (disrupted blood supply to the brain). A review of his admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was severely cognitively impaired. He had functional limitation in range of motion on both sides of his upper and lower extremities. He required substantial/maximal assistance to roll left and right in bed. Resident #85 was always incontinent of bladder. He had no falls since his re-entry to the facility. […]

• Actual harm, isolatedF689May 31, 2024

  Based on observations, staff, Podiatrist, and resident interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from injury while being loaded into the transportation van for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for accidents. Resident #72's right foot became caught between the van ramp and hydraulic lift platform and she sustained an avulsion to her right great toe (forcible tearing off of skin), the skin was unable to be sewn together, x-ray results showed the toe had a minimally displaced fracture (Resident #72). Findings included: Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

• Actual harm, isolatedF550Mar 13, 2023

  Based on observations, staff and resident interviews and record review the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity when incontinent care for a bowel movement was not provided when requested prior to the meal causing the resident to feel nasty while trying to eat (Resident #71), and when a staff member spoke in a loud stern harsh voice causing the residents to feel bad and upset (Residents #48 & #18) for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for dignity. The findings included; 1. Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and chronic pancreatitis. […]