Deficiency Index

Greenfield Care Center of Fairfield

Fairfield, California · CCN 055189

53 surveys since 2010, 17 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
245
Surveys
53
Harm or worse
17
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file36/53

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
90
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
EVA CARE GROUP
County
Solano
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
—
Health inspection
—
Staffing
—
Quality measures
—

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Mar 12, 2026

242 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.714.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.14—
Annual nurse turnover48.6%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$245,492 across 3 penalties
Payment denials
1
Special focus
SFF

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG45.1%H45.1%I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2937.2%E3950.0%F11.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B11.3%C—
CMS’s current file: 78 of the 245 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8805×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6844×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6583×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F7553×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Greenfield Care Center of Fairfield, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF921Nov 8, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment to 28 residents, who were identified by facility staff as ambulatory and/or used wheelchairs, enabling them to independently maneuver throughout the facility, when: 1. B-wing exit door was observed left open, with no alarm for unauthorized exit or entry, and with a Wanderguard Alarm which was not functioning; 2. A-wing door alarm was off, and the door was left unlocked and able to be opened from inside and outside; and, 3. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF684Mar 13, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care to attain and maintain their highest practical wellbeing consistent with professional standards of practice and facility's policy and procedure (P&P) for nine out of 31 sampled residents (Resident 265, 60, 267, 264, 266, 160, 262, 263, and 48) when: 1. Resident 265's prescribed pain medication, and Resident 60 and Resident 267's prescribed medications were ordered late; 2. Resident 264's order for pain medication was sent to the pharmacy without a valid prescription order and another prescribed medication was ordered late; 3. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF760Mar 13, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four out of 31 sampled residents (Resident 265, 264, 160, and 266) were free from significant medication errors when Resident 265, 264, 160, and 266 did not receive prescribed pain medications in accordance with the physician's order. These failures resulted in Resident 265, 264, 160, and 266 experiencing unnecessary pain and emotional distress which had negatively affected the residents' level of comfort, activity and sleep. Findings: 1a. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF686Mar 26, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to accurately assess, monitor, and provide wound care treatment to prevent development of facility acquired pressure ulcer (PU, a damage to an area of the skin caused by constant pressure on the area for a long time) and to prevent the worsening of an existing pressure ulcer for three of 23 sampled residents (Resident 21, Resident 33, and Resident 122), when: 1. a. The facility did not monitor Resident 21's right heel when he was wearing a Pressure Relief Ankle Foot Orthosis (PRAFO, an orthosis with an aluminum heel connecting bar that helps to hold the ankle in a neutral (90 degree) position. b. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF689Mar 26, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective fall management program for three out of 23 sampled residents(Residents 38, 13 and Resident 26) with Dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), when: A. 1. The facility did not follow its fall care plan (CP, a form where you can summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatment) when Resident 38 was not observed frequently and was not placed in a supervised area when out of bed such as when she was ambulating. 2. […]

Read 37 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 37 of 245 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 20, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 12, 2026Standard9 findings
  • Jan 7, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 11, 2025Standard10 findings
  • Apr 11, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 13, 2025Standard and complaint19 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 5, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 45 earlier surveys
  • Nov 5, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 11, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 6, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 27, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 26, 2024Standard30 findings · 4 harm
  • Sep 28, 2023Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 11, 2023Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 11, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 22, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 30, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2022Standard27 findings · 4 harm
  • Jun 7, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • May 10, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 2, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 30, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 8, 2021Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 11, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 15, 2021Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 6, 2019Standard5 findings
  • May 31, 2018Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Jun 22, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 27, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 6, 2017Standard10 findings
  • Jan 30, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 2, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 8, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Oct 15, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 5, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 5, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Nov 17, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 29, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 16, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 13, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Jan 22, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 17, 2014—8 findings
  • Jul 19, 2013—12 findings
  • Feb 1, 2013—16 findings
  • Oct 10, 2012—1 finding
  • Apr 5, 2012—3 findings
  • Mar 26, 2012—1 finding
  • Jan 26, 2012—16 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 19, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction