Greendale Park Nursing and Rehab
Greendale, Wisconsin · CCN 525549
31 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 133
- Surveys
- 31
- Harm or worse
- 12
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 105
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- BEDROCK HEALTHCARE
- County
- Milwaukee
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 39 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Wisconsin.
Last survey on record
Jul 1, 2026
131 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.14 | 3.64 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.58 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 78.0% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $280,827 across 3 penalties
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K11.2% | L— |
| Actual harm | G910.6% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D6272.9% | E22.4% | F1112.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6845×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6865×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F6895×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8804×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5543×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Greendale Park Nursing and Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF600Jul 18, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not implement their written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, for 1 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-GG of 1 CNA reviewed who was involved in an allegation of sexual assault against 1 (R10) of 1 residents who alleged sexual assault. The deficient practice has the potential to affect a pattern of the 69 residents residing in the facility as the staff on night shift float to assist on other units. CNA-GG's BID (background information disclosure) form, completed by CNA-GG upon hire at the facility, was completed inaccurately as CNA-GG answered no for the question, Were you ever convicted of any crime anywhere including in federal, state, local, military and tribal courts? […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF757Oct 27, 2021
Based on interview, record review and observation, the Facility failed to ensure that 2 (R7 & R3) of 2 Residents reviewed for anticoagulants was adequately monitored for therapeutic levels. * R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R7 had been on [MEDICATION(S)] 5 mg every night since prior to admission. The facility did not develop a base line care plan for [MEDICATION(S)] to address monitoring for signs/symptoms related to the use of [MEDICATION(S)]. R7's fall risk assessment placed R7 at 16, which is high risk for falls. On 9/15/21, R7 was found on the floor after falling out of bed. R7 indicated she hit her face on the floor and was observed to have an abrasion on her nose between her eyes. R7 was transferred to the hospital for an evaluation. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jan 27, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and do not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 4 (R41, R2, R60, and R10) of 6 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. R41 developed an avoidable left heel deep tissue injury that was not comprehensively assessed or measured since September 2025. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Mar 19, 2025
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent new injuries from developing for 1 of 2 (R3) residents reviewed for pressure injuries. R3's pressure injuries were not comprehensively assessed and treatment was not implemented timely. This deficient practice resulted in R3's development of a stage 3 pressure injury. Findings include: The facility policy titled Skin Assessment implemented 3/1/19 documents (in part) . . It is our policy to perform a full body skin assessment as part of our systemic approach to pressure injury prevention and management. 1. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jan 8, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R8) of 4 residents reviewed with pressure injuries had the necessary care and treatment to prevent and heal pressure injuries. R8 developed a facility acquired, unstageable pressure injury to their right great toe despite being at risk for the development of pressure injuries. R8's skin was not assessed upon admission and an individualized care plan was not developed based upon R8's risks and care needs. Assessments by the contracted wound care provider incorrectly identified the location of the wounds. Facility wound assessments were not comprehensive. […]
Read 31 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 31 of 133 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 1, 2026Complaint7 findings
- Jan 27, 2026Standard13 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 3, 2025Complaint4 findings
- Aug 12, 2025Complaint6 findings
- Mar 19, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 8, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 8, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings
- Jul 25, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 23 earlier surveys
- Jul 18, 2024Complaint14 findings · 3 harm
- Apr 9, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jan 17, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Jan 6, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jun 19, 2023Standard and complaint20 findings · 4 harm
- Mar 16, 2022Standard and complaint8 findings
- Oct 27, 2021Complaint8 findings · 2 harm
- May 5, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Oct 6, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Sep 24, 2018Standard4 findings
- Jul 19, 2017Standard and complaint3 findings
- Nov 1, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Aug 3, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Mar 31, 2016Standard1 finding
- Nov 12, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Feb 26, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Dec 8, 2014Standard2 findings
- Jul 24, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jun 18, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Apr 15, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Oct 3, 2013—1 finding
- Jul 12, 2012—3 findings
- Jun 9, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction