Deficiency Index

Green Hills Health Care Center

Ames, Iowa · CCN 165577

17 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
43
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2024
’10’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
56
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
LIFE CARE SERVICES
County
Story
Medicare-certified since
2010

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Nov 21, 2024

718 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.533.63
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.16—
Annual nurse turnover47.1%44.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD571.4%E228.6%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 7 of the 43 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Green Hills Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Nov 21, 2024

    Based on observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain dignity in dining for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #10 and #23) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #10 having BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment and had the following diagnoses: Alzheimer ' s Disease, Non-Alzheimer ' s Dementia, and history of stroke. The MDS also identified Resident #10 needing partial to moderate assistance with eating and no impairment of upper extremities. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Nov 21, 2024

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, staff failed to serve food under sanitary conditions, in order to reduce the risk of contamination and foodborne illness. The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: On 11/20/24 with meal service starting at 11:10 AM, Staff A, Food & Beverage Coordinator put on a glove, with the gloved hand opened a drawer, and with the same gloved hand touched tater tots, placed tater tots on a pan and into the oven. While preparing residents' plates, Staff A frequently leaned over the plates sitting on the shelf of the steam table with his apron touching the top surface side of the plates where food was placed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF655Nov 21, 2024

    Based on resident record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to develop and implement a base line care plan to include a resident's use of a high-risk medication for 1 resident (Resident #35) of 5 residents reviewed for base line care plans. The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #35, dated 11/8/24, included diagnoses of transient cerebral ischemic attack (stroke) long term use of anticoagulants (blood thinner medication). The MDS documented the resident was receiving an anticoagulant. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Nov 21, 2024

    Based on resident record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to include a resident's pressure ulcer and treatment for 1 resident (Resident #22) of 12 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #22, dated 10/8/24, included diagnoses of stroke and Parkinson's. The MDS documented the resident had a Stage 2 (partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis) and Stage 3 (full-thickness skin loss) pressure ulcer. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Nov 21, 2024

    Based on observation, resident record review, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to followed a physician's order for 1 resident (Resident #22) of 12 residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #22, dated 10/8/24, included diagnoses of stroke and Parkinson's. The MDS documented the resident had a Stage 2 (partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis) and Stage 3 (full-thickness skin loss) pressure ulcer. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 43 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 21, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Nov 22, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Jun 11, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 31, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Oct 11, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 14, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 31, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Feb 17, 2016Complaint1 finding
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Nov 3, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 21, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • May 28, 2015Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Aug 13, 2014Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 3, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Oct 14, 2013—1 finding
  • Oct 31, 2012—1 finding
  • Dec 29, 2011—3 findings
  • Nov 29, 2010—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction