Green Acres Healthcare
Mayfield, Kentucky · CCN 185341
19 surveys since 2011, 16 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 47
- Surveys
- 19
- Harm or worse
- 16
- Immediate jeopardy
- 9
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER
- County
- Graves · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Nov 19, 2025
355 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.25 | 3.66 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.49 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 51.5% | 45.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D11100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Green Acres Healthcare, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, patternF689Jun 30, 2022
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to provide supervision to ensure an environment free from accidents and hazards for two (2) of eighteen (18) sampled residents (Residents #3 and #5). The facility assessed Resident #3 and Resident #5 to be at high risk for falls. Review of Resident #3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed for seven (7) of the fourteen (14) falls the resident experienced between January 2021 through June 2022, the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were implemented to reduce or prevent additional falls and possible injuries. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF656Jun 30, 2022
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a Comprehensive Care Plan which ensured residents received the necessary adequate supervision and assistance for one (1) of eighteen (18) sampled residents (Resident #3). The facility assessed Resident #3 to be at high risk for falls on admission, quarterly; and, with falls he/she sustained. However, the facility failed to implement the necessary assistive devices and supervision to reduce/prevent further falls. Resident #3 experienced fourteen (14) unwitnessed falls from January 2021 through June 2022, with the resident experiencing serious injuries as a result of the fall on 10/27/2021. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF657Jun 30, 2022
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident's care plan was revised and updated; and, failed to provide the necessary supervision and assistive devices for each resident to prevent accidents for two (2) of eighteen (18) sampled residents (Resident #3 and Resident #5). The facility assessed Resident #3 as a high risk for falls on admission, quarterly and with any falls. However, the facility failed to review and revise Resident #3's care plan and failed to implement the necessary supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. The facility repeatedly care planned Resident #3 to ask for assistance when picking items up off the floor and with transfers. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Nov 19, 2025
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to inform the resident representative when there was a significant change a resident's status for 1 of 4 residents sampled for notification, out of 6 total sampled residents (Resident (R)1). The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Notification of Changes, reviewed [DATE], revealed when there was a change in a resident's condition requiring notification, the facility was to promptly inform the resident, consult the resident's physician, and notify the resident's representative (ex. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF655Nov 19, 2025
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan with instructions to provide effective and person-centered care for 1 of 6 sampled residents, (Resident (R)1). The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Baseline Care Plan, reviewed [DATE], revealed the facility was to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provided effective and person-centered care of the resident to meet professional standards of quality of care. Review further revealed the baseline care plan was to be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission. […]
Read 31 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 31 of 47 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 19, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Aug 15, 2025Standard2 findings
- May 26, 2023Standard2 findings
- Jun 30, 2022Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
- Dec 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Sep 17, 2020Standard4 findings
- Nov 18, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Dec 20, 2018Standard3 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
- Jan 24, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Oct 19, 2017Standard1 finding
- Mar 7, 2017Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 14, 2017Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Jul 10, 2014Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jun 6, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Jul 3, 2013—2 findings
- May 8, 2013Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 7, 2012—4 findings
- Apr 14, 2011—1 finding
- Mar 18, 2011Standard and complaint7 findings · 7 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- The Willows at HarrodsburgHarrodsburg1 harm finding
- Signature Healthcare of GeorgetownGeorgetownno harm findings
- Elkton Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterElktonno harm findings
- Signature Healthcare of McCreary County Rehab andPine Knot6 harm findings
- Elizabethtown Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterElizabethtownno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction