Deficiency Index

Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care Community

Robbinsdale, Minnesota · CCN 245279

28 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
145
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file17/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
96
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY
County
Hennepin
Medicare-certified since
1985

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 52 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Minnesota.

Last survey on record

Jun 4, 2026

158 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.214.39
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.33—
Annual nurse turnover30.1%37.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3873.1%E917.3%F35.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C23.8%
CMS’s current file: 52 of the 145 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5503×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5843×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5852×

    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care Community, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 8, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to assess elopement risk, implement interventions, and prevent an elopement for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for elopement who successfully eloped from the facility. This deficient practice resulted in immediate jeopardy (IJ) to resident health and safety. R1 eloped from the facility on 10/3/21, at 3:40 p.m. and was found by staff on the street near the facility. In addition, the facility failed to complete elopement assessments, and identify and implement interventions for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R3) who had documented exit seeking behavior, wandering, and/or elopement attempts. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Aug 25, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to monitor and develop additional person-centered care plan interventions to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 1 of 4 residents (R1) resulted in actual harm when R1 who had dementia, hallucinations, agitation, and a habit of wandering into other residents' rooms on eight different occasions leading to resident-to-resident altercations. During the eighth incident, R1 suffered a Subdural Hematoma (a serious condition where blood collects between the layers of the brain after a head injury.) The severity of the injury resulted in the inability to walk, feed himself, and needed total care from staff. His prognosis was poor and required end of life hospice care. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Aug 25, 2026

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete neurological assessments as indicated after a head injury sustained during a resident-to-resident altercation for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who sustained a significant head injury. R1 suffered actual harm resulting in a subdural hematoma (a collection of blood between the brain and its outer covering) and was sent to emergency department and returned on hospice care. Findings include: R1's July medication administration record (MAR) dated [DATE] through [DATE], indicated he received his scheduled Tylenol order for 1000 milligrams (mg) at 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. In addition, R1 had an order for additional as needed (PRN) Tylenol 1000 mgs once a day for pain but, no additional doses were given from [DATE] through [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 4, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure staff consistently wore hair restraints and gloves while serving food. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain food temperatures within the desired range. The facility also failed to consistently cover food items placed in the freezer and date the items with the date placed and the date food items were to be used by. This had the potential to affect all 88 residents who resided at the nursing home. Findings include: On 6/1/26 at 5:11 p.m., dietary aide (DA)-A was observed setting up kitchenette area for evening meal service. DA-A had her hair pulled back in a ponytail, with strands of hair hanging free from the ponytail on the sides of her head. DA-A was wearing a standard uniform top. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jun 4, 2026

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to implement routine surveillance of signs and symptoms of illness/infection which were not currently being treated with antibiotic therapy or other treatment. This had the potential to impact all 88 residents who resided at the facility, as well as staff, and visitors. Findings include: A review of the Infection Surveillance Reports was completed for the months of March, April, and May of 2026. The documents included the total number of infections, whether facility or community acquired infections, the facility acquired infection incidence rates, and the number of multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs). The surveillance logs further classified the types by category of infection. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 145 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 25, 2026Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 4, 2026Standard16 findings
  • May 14, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 2, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 30, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 14, 2025Standard8 findings
  • Jan 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 24, 2024Complaint3 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Dec 6, 2024Complaint8 findings
  • Jul 17, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 7, 2023Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Nov 26, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 29, 2022Standard and complaint8 findings
  • May 13, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 7, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 6, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 8, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 22, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 29, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 10, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Feb 28, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Mar 31, 2017Standard13 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 12, 2016Standard14 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 29, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Feb 6, 2014Standard12 findings
  • Apr 25, 2013—5 findings
  • Jan 27, 2012—11 findings
  • Dec 17, 2010—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction