Deficiency Index

Good Samaritan Society - Bottineau

Bottineau, North Dakota · CCN 355093

27 surveys since 2011, 18 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
151
Surveys
27
Harm or worse
18
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/27

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
52
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY
County
Bottineau · rural
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 42 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in North Dakota.

Last survey on record

Jun 29, 2026

133 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.594.29
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.95—
Annual nurse turnover63.5%50.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$110,247 across 2 penalties
Payment denials
1
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ13.2%K—L—
Actual harmG26.5%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2271.0%E619.4%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 31 of the 151 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6003×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6402×

    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Good Samaritan Society - Bottineau, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF550May 24, 2023

    Based on observation; information received from the complainant; review of the North Dakota Long Term Care Ombudsman Program's Guide to Resident Rights; and resident, family, and staff interview, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity and care for residents in a manner and an environment that promotes, maintains, or enhances of their quality of life for 4 of 10 sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #9) and 6 supplemental residents (Resident #13, #14, #15, #18, #19, and #20). Failure to protect residents from wandering and aggressive residents and the unwanted physical touch of a visitor violated their right to live in a safe environment free from abuse/neglect and resulted in negative psychosocial outcomes. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF600May 24, 2023

    Based on observation; information received from the complainant; record review; review of facility policy; and resident, family, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from physical abuse and neglect for 4 of 10 sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #9) and 6 supplemental residents (Resident #13, #14, #15, #18, #19, and #20) and failed to protect 2 of 2 sampled residents from resident to resident abuse (Resident #5 and #7). Failure to provide services necessary to avoid mental anguish and emotional distress resulted in fear, anxiety, an unsafe environment for residents, and actual psychosocial harm. During the on-site complaint survey, the team determined a potential Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation existed on 05/17/23 at 3:34 p.m. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF689May 24, 2023

    Based on observation, information received from the complainant, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards for 1 of 1 coffee/hot water machine in the dining room. Failure to ensure appropriate coffee/water temperatures resulted in serving temperatures above the acceptable range and may result in serious burns/injuries to residents. During the on-site complaint survey, the team determined an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation existed on 05/17/23 at 3:34 p.m. The IJ resulted from temperature readings obtained from the coffee/hot water machine, a lack of temperature monitoring by staff, and an injury to a resident. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jul 16, 2025

    Based on review of the facility reported incident (FRI) investigation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free of mental/physical abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) Failure to prevent Resident #1 form the abusive actions of other residents (Resident #2 and #3) resulted in Resident #1 experiencing fear, anxiety, and injury.During the on-site FRI investigation survey, the team consulted with the State Survey Agency (SSA) on 07/10/25 at 12:19 p.m. and determined an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation existed on 04/30/25. The facility failed to protect residents from abuse which resulted in resident-to-resident altercations. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684May 13, 2025

    Based on record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for 1 of 1 closed record (Resident #1) who experienced multiple medical incidents and a decline in health status. Failure to notify the provider and resident representative of the initial choking event and further medical incidents, delayed physician and representative input for testing/monitoring/treatment, contributed to the resident's decline followed by hospitalization, and may have contributed to the resident's subsequent death. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record occurred on 05/13/25. A Minimum Data Set (MDS)Assessment, dated 03/10/25, identified severely impaired cognition, and dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). […]

Read 36 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 36 of 151 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 29, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 11, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Sep 11, 2025Standard12 findings
  • Jul 16, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 13, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 20, 2025Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Jan 22, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 18, 2024Standard4 findings
Show the 19 earlier surveys
  • Jul 16, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 5, 2023Standard and complaint7 findings
  • May 24, 2023Complaint16 findings · 3 harm
  • Jul 7, 2022Standard and complaint15 findings
  • May 13, 2021Standard12 findings
  • Oct 28, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 14, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Aug 1, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Jun 22, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Jul 14, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Jan 28, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Jul 16, 2015Standard10 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 15, 2015Standard8 findings
  • Jun 26, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Sep 26, 2013—16 findings · 8 harm
  • Sep 27, 2012—6 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 30, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 15, 2012—4 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 27, 2011—8 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction