Deficiency Index

Glenaire

Cary, North Carolina · CCN 345445

9 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
22
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
71
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Wake
Medicare-certified since
1993

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Dec 31, 2025

313 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day7.424.42
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.88—
Annual nurse turnover36.8%41.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD250.0%E250.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 22 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Glenaire, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Dec 31, 2025

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to update the comprehensive care plan to include the use of bed rails. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for bed rails (Resident #1, Resident #6, Resident #41 and Resident #49). Findings included: a. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's bed rail assessment dated [DATE] was signed by Nurse #1 and indicated the resident had a bed rail on the left side of his bed to serve as an enabler and promote independence. Resident #1's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and the bed rail was not used as a restraint. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700Dec 31, 2025

    Based on observations, record reviews, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to complete a bed rail assessment for one resident (Resident #49), failed to document consent for the use of bed rails for two residents (Resident #49 and Resident #6), failed to assess entrapment risk or document attempts for alternatives to bed rails prior to installing or using bed rails for four residents (Resident #1, Resident #6, Resident #41 and Resident #49). This deficient practice occurred for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for side rails (Resident #1, Resident #6, Resident #41 and Resident #49).Findings included: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure and below the knee leg amputation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 19, 2022

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to date leftover and thawing food items and cover food in 1 of 1 kitchen walk-in refrigerator and failed to discard expired resident food in a nourishment room refrigerator (Central Hall). This had the potential to affect food served to residents. Findings included: 1. A tour was conducted of the facility kitchen on [DATE] at 11:15 AM with the executive chef. An observation of the walk-in refrigerator revealed a container of pepperoni with no label with date opened and an open plastic wrap cover, a container of pimento cheese with no label or date, a large container of cut melon with no label or date, a container of hard-boiled eggs with no label or date, two boxes of thawing chicken on the bottom shelf open to air with no… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Dec 31, 2025

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of resident property to law enforcement. This deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation (Resident #78).Finding Included:Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of fracture of unspecified part of the left femur.The facility's 24 hour initial allegation report dated 1/13/2025, completed by the Director of Nursing (DON), documented that Resident #78 told a therapist she was missing $100 from her wallet. Adult Protective Services (APS) was notified. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF883Dec 31, 2025

    Based on record review, and staff, resident and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to provide pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations to a resident with a signed consent form to receive the vaccinations. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations (Resident #4).Findings included: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment also showed that the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines had not been offered. Resident #4's medical record revealed no documentation of vaccination administration or any signed consent forms indicating acceptance or refusal of the pneumococcal or influenza vaccinations. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 22 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 31, 2025Standard4 findings
  • May 19, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2020Standard2 findings
  • Feb 28, 2019Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Apr 5, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Jun 9, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Jul 3, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Mar 23, 2012—2 findings
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • Jan 6, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction