George E. Wahlen Ogden Veterans Home
Ogden, Utah · CCN 465172
8 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 25
- Surveys
- 8
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- Government - State
- Chain
- AVALON HEALTH CARE
- County
- Weber
- Medicare-certified since
- 2010
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Feb 28, 2025
619 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.05 | 4.41 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.50 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 26.7% | 54.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $12,363 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J216.7% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G18.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D975.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at George E. Wahlen Ogden Veterans Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Feb 28, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 9 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure each resident was free from abuse. Specifically, a resident's husband tried to shove a spoon with medication into another resident's mouth. In another incident the same resident's husband shoved her and removed her clothing to change her clothes. There were no interventions to prevent the resident from further abuse. The findings for resident 1 were determined to have resulted in immediate jeopardy. Resident identifiers: 1 and 2. Findings included: NOTICE On 2/26/25 at 4:30 PM, an Immediate Jeopardy was identified when the facility failed to implement Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recommended practices to prevent various forms of abuse. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF609Feb 28, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 9 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency. Specifically, it was not reported to the State Survey Agency when a resident's husband tried to shove a spoon with medication into her mouth. The findings for resident 1 were determined to have resulted in immediate jeopardy. Resident identifiers: 1 and 2. Findings included: NOTICE On 2/26/25 at 4:30 PM, an Immediate Jeopardy was identified when the facility failed to implement Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recommended practices to prevent various forms of abuse. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Aug 7, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review, for 2 of 38 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's choice. Specifically, a resident was administered medications by the nurse after he was unable to put them in his own mouth and was experiencing confusion, having difficulty staying awake, had gurgling sounds when breathing, and difficulty keeping oxygen saturation above 90 percent. No monitoring was documented for his change in condition. The resident was discharged to the hospital with an overdose. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Feb 28, 2025
Based on observation, interview or record review it was determined, for 2 of 9 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered plan, the residents' goals and preferences. Specifically, residents on oxygen were using empty oxygen tanks. Resident identifier: 7 and 8. Findings Included: 1. Resident 7 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic systolic congestive heart failure. On 2/25/25 at 1:32 PM, an observation was made of resident 7's portable oxygen tank while in use. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Aug 7, 2024
Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 38 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure each resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident rolled out of a high bed and hit his head on a feeding tube pump. In addition, a family member noticed the change in condition and transported the resident to the hospital. Resident identifier: 119. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 25 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 28, 2025Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 7, 2024Complaint9 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 16, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Apr 24, 2019Standard1 finding
- Jan 31, 2018Standard1 finding
- Jun 25, 2015Standard3 findings
- Jun 17, 2013—4 findings
- Nov 3, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction