George Ade Memorial Health Care Center
Brook, Indiana · CCN 155719
24 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 146
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 70
- Ownership
- Government - County
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Newton
- Medicare-certified since
- 2003
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 38 government-run facilities of 66–99 beds in Indiana.
Last survey on record
Mar 6, 2026
248 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.53 | 3.52 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.35 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 30.8% | 41.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.8% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2492.3% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B13.8% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6882×
Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at George Ade Memorial Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Nov 12, 2025
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents, related to one staff member (CNA 1) assisting a resident with a shower who was care planned for two staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADL's) resulting in the resident falling in the shower and receiving an abrasion to the right knee and a laceration to the right eyebrow that required four sutures. The resident also had a decline in normal functioning related to ambulation after the fall and was diagnosed eight days later with a fractured right hip for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. (Resident D)Finding includes: Resident D's record was reviewed on 11/12/25 at 1:18 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867Dec 2, 2022
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to report and investigate abuse allegations, which also been cited on previous surveys, and ensure actions were developed and implemented to attempt to correct the deficiencies through the quality assessment and assurance (QAA) process as evidenced by the number of deficiencies cited involving abuse, abuse reporting and abuse investigations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 44 of 44 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Interview with the Administrator on 12/2/22 at 2:37 p.m., indicated the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee met at least quarterly and the committee consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing, department heads and therapy. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Dec 2, 2022
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a complete infection control program which ensured ongoing monitoring of patterns and trends of infections. This had the potential to affect all 44 residents who resided in the facility. They also failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was used during wound care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and during a random observation of medication administration (Residents C and 8) Findings include: 1. The Infection Control Program was reviewed on 12/1/22 at 9:12 a.m. The October 2022 Infection Control Log and Grid, indicated there were 11 cases of urinary tract infections (UTI) that month. There was a facility map that was color coded for types of infections. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jul 19, 2022
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were in place and implemented to properly prevent and or contain COVID-19 related to the following: - Handwashing not completed after resident care (Resident E and Employee 11), - N95 mask and eye protection not worn properly by an employee in a resident area (Employee 8), - Personal protective equipment (PPE) not discarded appropriately related to N95 masks stored in paper bags in/on the isolation carts and on the handrails for 5 residents on isolation for COVID -19 (Residents D, G, H, K, and L) - High touch surfaces (hallway hand rails, ink pens for screening) not sanitized with a disinfectant effective against COVID-19 and contact times for disinfectants not followed per… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF885Jul 19, 2022
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and resident representatives/families were notified of COVID-19 positive residents timely. This had the potential to affect 44 of the 44 residents who reside in the facility. Finding includes: During an interview with the Director of Nursing on 7/18/22 at 9 a.m., the first employee to be tested COVID-19 positive was on 6/18/22. The following are the dates of employee COVID-19 positive testing: On 6/20/22 - 1 employee On 6/21/22 - 1 employee On 6/22/22 - 2 employees On 6/23/22 - 1 employee On 6/24/22 - 1 employee On 6/25/22 - 1 employee On 6/26/22 - 2 employees On 7/1/22 - 2 employees On 7/4/22 - 1 employee On 7/6/22 - 1 employee On 7/8/22 - 1 employee On 7/9/22 - 1 employee On 7/10/22 - 3 employees On 7/11/22 -… […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 146 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 6, 2026Standard and complaint9 findings
- Nov 12, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 24, 2025Standard4 findings
- Oct 18, 2024Complaint4 findings
- Jan 12, 2024Standard7 findings
- Dec 2, 2022Standard and complaint10 findings
- Jul 19, 2022Complaint5 findings
- Apr 6, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- Dec 16, 2021Complaint8 findings
- Aug 26, 2021Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jan 13, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Oct 3, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Sep 15, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Feb 26, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Nov 19, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jun 21, 2019Standard6 findings
- Apr 16, 2018Standard10 findings
- Feb 17, 2017Standard and complaint14 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 19, 2016Complaint5 findings
- Jan 25, 2016Standard10 findings
- Jan 14, 2015Standard10 findings
- Mar 6, 2014—4 findings
- Jan 31, 2013—14 findings
- Nov 3, 2011—7 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction