Deficiency Index

Future Care Homewood

Baltimore, Maryland · CCN 215249

21 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2026.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
158
Surveys
21
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/21

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
141
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH
County
Baltimore City
Medicare-certified since
1993

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 90 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Maryland.

Last survey on record

Jul 28, 2026

104 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.333.50
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.38—
Annual nurse turnover44.8%42.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG11.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4455.0%E2835.0%F33.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C45.0%
CMS’s current file: 80 of the 158 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8124×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8424×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6953×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Future Care Homewood, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 28, 2026

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent an avoidable fall with injury when they failed to follow the resident's plan of care to provide two staff person assistance with bed mobility. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #103. This was evident for 1 complaint (#3096869) of 4 complaints reviewed during a complaint survey. Corrective measures were put in place prior to the start of the complaint survey, so this citation is past noncompliance with the compliance date of 6/30/26.The findings include:As defined by Harvard Health Medical School, a subdural hematoma occurs when a blood vessel near the surface of the brain bursts. Blood builds up between the brain and the brain's tough outer lining. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Jun 30, 2026

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure meals were served to residents at an appealing and palatable temperature. This was evident for 1 out of 1 test tray temperature observation. This practice has the potential to affect all residents who eat the food prepared by the facility.The findings include:Resident interviews revealed ongoing concerns regarding the quality, taste temperature, variety, and portions of meals served by the facility.On 6/23/2026 at 8:54 AM, Resident #104 stated that the food tasted awful, lacked variety, and was served cold.On 6/23/2026 at 9:14 AM, Resident #8 stated that food did not taste good.On 6/23/2026 at 9:27 AM, Resident #14 stated that the food was room temperature.On 6/23/2026 at 9:32 AM, Resident #39 stated… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jun 30, 2026

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled and stored to maintain their integrity and prevent the use of outdated food. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen, and this finding had the potential to affect all residents who received food prepared by the facility. The findings include: On, 6/23/2026 at 7:53 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (Staff #8), the surveyor observed more than 20 plastic souffle cups containing salad dressing labeled with a preparation date of 6/9/2026. The surveyor also observed a clear container of leftover egg salad covered with a plastic wrap and labeled 6/13/2026. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF921May 15, 2026

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for two (2) out of 21 sampled residents (Resident [R] #6 and R#19) when housekeeping staff failed to clean the residents' room and bathroom which had a strong smell of urine; and general housekeeping duties were not completed across three (3) units (Units #4, #5, and #6). Intakes #2608459 and #2599200 are directly related to these findings.The findings include:Review conducted on 5/13/26 at 2:00 PM of the facility's 1.2 Environmental Hygiene Cleaning & Disinfection Program dated July 2020 noted: Cleaning is the physical removal of dirt, body fluids, and other organic matter. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF697May 21, 2025

    Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate pain management for residents. This was evident for 2 resident (Resident #137 and Resident #410) of 3 residents who were reviewed for pain management during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) During a complaint investigation on 5/12/2025, at 5:58 PM, it was revealed that in February 2025, a complainant reported Resident #410 was in constant pain from wounds and often received medication late. On 5/13/2025, at 9:50 AM, Registered Nurse (RN #13) explained that nurses documented medication administration time when they physically handed medications to residents. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 158 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 28, 2026Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 30, 2026Standard14 findings
  • May 15, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 21, 2025Standard and complaint31 findings
  • Aug 8, 2022Standard and complaint15 findings
  • Jun 14, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Mar 10, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 5, 2018Standard30 findings
Show the 13 earlier surveys
  • Sep 20, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 26, 2017Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Sep 8, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 15, 2016Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Feb 27, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Apr 1, 2014Standard12 findings
  • Nov 19, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 18, 2013—7 findings
  • Mar 7, 2013—6 findings
  • Feb 7, 2012—2 findings
  • Jan 18, 2012—4 findings
  • Mar 28, 2011—11 findings
  • Oct 26, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction