Deficiency Index

Fort Tryon Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing

New York, New York · CCN 335257

16 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
41
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
205
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
Independent
County
New York
Medicare-certified since
1968

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Dec 18, 2025

326 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.333.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.82—
Annual nurse turnover37.0%33.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD8100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 41 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Fort Tryon Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 7, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during a fifth Focused Infection Control COVID-19 Survey conducted on 01/07/2021, the facility did not ensure infection control surveillance designed to help prevent the development and transmission of COVID-19. Specifically, the COVID-19 staff screening completed upon entry did not include screening questions to confirm if staff members had signs and symptoms of COVID-19. The finding is: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released a memo titled, Guidance for Infection Control and Prevention of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in nursing homes, Ref: QSO-20-14-NH (dated 03/04/2020 and revised 09/28/2020). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF760Jun 3, 2021

    F760 Based on interviews and record review during an abbreviated survey (Case # NY00275054), on 05/13/2021, the facility did not ensure its residents were free from any significant medication errors. Specifically, (Resident #1, #2, and #3), were ordered to take nothing by mouth (NPO), however the physician ordered medications to be administered by mouth. The findings were: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration, revised 01/20/2021 documented that medications are to be given as ordered, if there is any question in regard to dose, route of administration or medication form, the person in doubt is not to give the medication until verification is received from the physician. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF557Dec 18, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. This was evident for two (2) (Residents #42 and #9) of three (3) residents reviewed for Dignity out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, Residents #42 and #9 were observed wearing hospital patient gowns on multiple occasions.The findings are: The facility's policy titled Residents Rights: Dignity dated 12/01/2025 documented that it is the policy of the facility to ensure that all residents are treated with respect and dignity, including the right to retain and use personal… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF584Dec 18, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that necessary housekeeping and maintenance services were provided to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for residents. This was evident for one (1) (3rd Floor) of five (5) resident units observed. Specifically, accumulation of dust, dirt, and stains were noted on bedside tables, intravenous poles, feeding pumps, oxygen concentrators and suction machines; and torn arm rests and soiled wheelchairs were observed in resident rooms on the 3rd Floor. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Dec 18, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive care plan was developed to address a resident's sleep pattern disturbance. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #187) of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #187 who was receiving Ambien for Insomnia had no care plan developed and implemented to address the resident's ongoing difficulty staying asleep. The findings include:The facility's policy titled Care Plan Development with a last reviewed date of 12/12/2024 documented the facility shall develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 41 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 18, 2025Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Jun 21, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Mar 17, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Jun 3, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 7, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 1, 2020Complaint4 findings
  • May 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 18, 2019Complaint1 finding
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Jun 18, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Aug 25, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Jun 2, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Mar 29, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 28, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Feb 8, 2013—4 findings
  • Dec 30, 2011—2 findings
  • Dec 16, 2010—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction