Deficiency Index

Flannery Oaks Guest House

Baton Rouge, Louisiana · CCN 195477

17 surveys since 2010, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
93
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse4

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
130
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
PLANTATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY
County
E. Baton Rouge
Medicare-certified since
2000

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 98 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Louisiana.

Last survey on record

Jul 2, 2025

495 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.003.53
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.15—
Annual nurse turnover54.7%48.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1341.9%E1445.2%F26.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B13.2%C13.2%
CMS’s current file: 31 of the 93 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6583×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6452×

    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Flannery Oaks Guest House, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 2, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure food was properly sealed, stored, and dated in the refrigerator and dry storage area of the facility's kitchen. This had the potential to affect 100 residents who were served from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Food Storage Labeling, with a revised date of 10/2018, revealed, in part: The facility will store and label all foods to ensure safety and quality. 7. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF865Jul 2, 2025

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of its ongoing Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program demonstrating the development, implementation, and evaluation of corrective actions or performance improvement activities. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 100 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Quality Meeting Policy and Procedure, dated 04/28/2025 revealed, in part, the following: Purpose: To identify, respond, track and trend, and monitor for improvement of facility potential quality deficiencies. The overall goal is to improve the quality of care for the residents of the facility. Policy: II. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jul 29, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection by failing to ensure staff wore appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing care to 2 (#15 and #62) of 6 residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions reviewed in the final sample. Findings: Review of the provider policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy & Procedure with a revision date of 04/01/2024 revealed the following, in part: Policy: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF558Jul 2, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 2 of 2 (#201 and #401) residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, Resident Call Light System, dated 09/14/2022, revealed the following, in part: Purpose: To provide a communication system with audible or visual signals to allow residents to call for staff assistance . Procedure 6. When providing care to residents, be sure to positon the call light conveniently within reach for the resident to use. Resident #201 Review of Resident #201's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, Transient Ischemic Attack and chronic pain. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Jul 2, 2025

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan, which met the needs of 2 (#29 and #56) of 20 residents Care Plans reviewed in the final sample. The facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Care Plan included the following: 1. Resident #29's discharge goals; and 2. Resident #56's physical need for a Mechanical Lift for transfers. 1. Review of Resident #29's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis, which included Rheumatoid Arthritis. Review of Resident #29's most recent Care Plan revealed no documented evidence of discharge plans. 2. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 93 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 29, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Jul 2, 2025Standard11 findings
  • Jan 2, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • May 16, 2024Standard15 findings
  • Apr 27, 2023Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Feb 23, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 5, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 27, 2022Standard6 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Nov 12, 2020Standard10 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 14, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Mar 10, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Apr 3, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Apr 26, 2012—3 findings
  • Feb 8, 2012—3 findings
  • Jun 10, 2011—23 findings · 2 harm
  • May 19, 2011—4 findings
  • Oct 14, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction