Farmington Presbyterian Manor
Farmington, Missouri · CCN 265583
14 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 38
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 90
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA
- County
- St. Francois · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=15, floor 20).
Last survey on record
May 6, 2026
187 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.04 | 3.64 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.94 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 64.4% | 46.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1090.9% | E19.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Farmington Presbyterian Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 14, 2023
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to keep one resident (Resident #1) safe when the resident got his/her head stuck between the transfer bar attached to the bed frame and the mattress out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 61. The administrator was notified on 06/14/23 at 2:45 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 06/14/2023. The IJ was removed on 06/14/23, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. The facility did not provide a policy regarding use of mobility rails. 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF886Nov 18, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct testing in a manner that is consistent with current standards of practice for conducting Novel Coronavirus 19 (COVID-19, an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 ([CONDITION(S)]-CoV-2). Common symptoms include fever, cough, fatigue, shortness of breath, and loss of smell and taste) tests by not using the recommended Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during nasal testing of three residents (Resident #11, #14 and #15). The facility further failed to test a symptomatic resident (Resident #1) in a timely manner. The facility census was 59. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Jan 30, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond to or act upon the grievances and dietary recommendations for five residents (Resident #7, #17, #40, #45, and #62) out of 17 sampled residents, six residents (Resident #4, #6, #10, #28, #35, and #66) outside the sample and had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The facility's census was 67. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Council, revised January 5, 2023, showed: - Residents of each community within each level of living (independent, assisted, and skilled nursing) may organize and participate in resident councils. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Nov 18, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to serve food in a manner to reduce the risk of cross contamination and food borne illness by not washing/sanitizing their hands between serving individual resident's their trays. The facility census was 59. Record review of the policy and procedure titled Hand Sanitizers in Dining Room, last revised 2018, showed: - Train any individual who serves food on proper hand hygiene including handwashing and use of approved gel sanitizers; - All staff must wash hands in a designated hand sink prior to assisting residents/patients in the dining room. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Nov 18, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program that provided a safe and sanitary environment for all residents during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19, an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 ([CONDITION(S)]-CoV-2) pandemic when staff failed use to appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), failed to remove PPE upon exiting a COVID-19 positive resident's room, failed to post signage outside of a Covid-19 positive resident's (Resident #1) room on the use of specific PPE needed to provide care, failed to post signage at the facility entrances to alert visitors of current COVID-19 outbreak, and failed to ensure the door of a COVID-19 positive resident's (Resident #2) room… […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 38 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 6, 2026Standard3 findings
- Jan 30, 2025Standard4 findings
- Nov 17, 2023Standard2 findings
- Jun 14, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 8, 2022Standard2 findings
- Nov 18, 2021Infection control3 findings
- Sep 13, 2019Standard4 findings
- Jul 27, 2018Standard2 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Aug 17, 2017Standard5 findings
- Jul 21, 2016Standard4 findings
- Sep 18, 2015Standard2 findings
- Jul 11, 2014Standard3 findings
- Sep 26, 2013—2 findings
- Jul 20, 2012—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction