Fairmont Rehabilitation Hospital
Lodi, California · CCN 055242
22 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 54
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 59
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- THE ENSIGN GROUP
- County
- San Joaquin
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.
Last survey on record
May 7, 2026
186 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.55 | 4.36 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.51 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 34.7% | 36.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2163.6% | E721.2% | F412.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B13.0% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8804×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Fairmont Rehabilitation Hospital, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 7, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in food handling, storage, and preparation areas for 53 residents who received meals from the kitchen when:1. Debris was present inside the clean utensils drawer;2. Mold was found inside a bag of cherries stored in the refrigerator;3. Cereal container lids were found loose;4. An opened box of iced tea bags in the dry goods area contained a plastic bag with a hole;5. Four spice containers were observed with lids that were open and could not be closed;6. Two large spice containers with screw-top lids were not tightly sealed;7. The casserole scalloped potatoes box was not properly sealed;8. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jul 2, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive water safety management program based on nationally accepted standards to minimize the risk of Legionella (a serious lung infection) and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens (a microorganism [bacteria] that exists in water sources or plumbing [pipes required for the water supply, heating and sanitation in a building] systems that can cause serious illness in people over [AGE] years of age and have weakened immune systems) for a census of 54 when: a. The facility did not complete and document a facility-wide assessment of potential Legionella growth areas to include flow chart, b. The facility did not implement adequate control measures, c. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 16, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food storage and production in accordance with professional standards of food safety for the 56 residents who received prepared food from the kitchen when: 1. Open food packages (one bag of bran cereal, one bag of biscuit mix, and a five-gallon storage bin with about two-gallons of rice) were not labeled with a use by date; and, 2. Wet plate covers were stacked together. These failures had the potential to expose residents to food borne illnesses (refers to illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 8:47 a.m., in the kitchen accompanied by the Dietary Manager (DM), the following findings were observed: 1. a. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 8, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and prevent hazards at specific points of food handling when: 1. Ice was built up in the freezer; 2. Four cans had dents; 3. The Dietary Aide did not wear a beard net while handling food; and 4. The Cook did not follow the recipe. These failures had the potential to put 50 vulnerable residents receiving food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings: 1. During the initial tour of the kitchen on 4/5/22, starting at 8:48 a.m., accompanied by the Cook 1 and Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), an ice buildup was observed on top of an aluminum surface of a food tray in the refrigerator and ice was observed on a rack in the freezer. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF583Jan 16, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe use of facility owned smart phones (also known as cell phones) for communication with medical providers regarding resident's Protected Health Information (or PHI, refers to any individually identifiable health information about a resident) with a census of 56 residents. This unsafe practice could compromise residents' private medical information and violate residents' health information privacy and confidentiality. Findings: During a concurrent inspection of the facility's Station 2 medication storage areas and interview with Licensed Nurse (LN) 7, on 1/13/25, at 10:26 AM, a smart phone marked with Nurse Station 2, 209-3 . [phone number]) was noticed sitting unattended next to a computer at the station. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 54 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 7, 2026Standard8 findings
- Jan 9, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Jul 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 20, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 7, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 16, 2025Standard and complaint10 findings
- Jan 12, 2024Standard6 findings
- Jan 25, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Apr 8, 2022Standard4 findings
- Mar 17, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Dec 1, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Jun 9, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Aug 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jul 26, 2019Standard1 finding
- Oct 3, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Oct 25, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Sep 1, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jul 27, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Jul 3, 2015Standard3 findings
- Sep 18, 2014Standard3 findings
- Sep 5, 2012—1 finding
- Jul 21, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction