Fahrney-Keedy Memorial Home

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Fahrney-Keedy Memorial Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Mar 26, 2026

  Based on interviews and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a full-time, qualified dietetic service supervisor to oversee food preparation and daily kitchen operations. This had the potential to affect all residents.The findings include: On 3/25/26 at 12:25 PM, the Director of Culinary Services (Staff #3) was interviewed. During the interview, he reported that he was not certified as a dietary manager (CDM). Staff #3 stated that he received consultation from a regional CDM (Staff #7). Staff #3 reported that consultation from CDM Staff #, occurred about once a month, and sometimes more frequently.On 03/25/2026 at 12:45 PM, The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 3, 2025

  Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: 1) An initial tour of the facility's kitchen was conducted on 1/27/25 at 8:40 AM with staff #4, food services manager. An observation of the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator revealed the following: -opened Greek yogurt, Pineapple juice, chicken base seasoning, Hungarian paprika seasoning, Dijon mustard sauce, Worcestershire sauce, and an opened lemon juice and cooking wine halfway used. The observation failed to show the items' open and use-by dates. Staff #4 said they should have been labeled with these dates. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Feb 3, 2025

  Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed: to comply with isolation protocols, to have a prevention plan for Legionella, and staff failed to use appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). This was evident for 3 (Resident #71, #85, #39) of 6 residents reviewed for infection control; and 1 of 1 plan reviewed for water management which has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: 1) Resident #71 was diagnosis with pneumonia on 1/22/25 after chest x-ray confirmed it. On 1/27/25 at 9:11 AM the Assistant Director of Nursing (Staff #1) reported that Resident #71 is on droplet precautions, and will require gowning to enter the room. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Mar 26, 2026

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received physician-ordered treatments and medications. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #44) of 1 resident reviewed for general skin conditions and 1(Resident #9) of 1 resident reviewed for pain management.Findings include:1). Resident #44 has a medical history that includes, but is not limited to, chronic pain, anxiety, depression, respiratory failure, diabetes, cerebrovascular accident (stroke), and a history of self-inflicted skin injuries related to scratching.On 3/23/26 at 12:30 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #44 lying in bed watching television with a bandage to the right arm and multiple sores on the forehead and scalp.On 3/24/26 at… […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Feb 3, 2025

  Based on observations, records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident's urine collection bag was kept in a privacy bag to maintain dignity. This was evident for 1 (Resident #11) of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. The findings include: Resident #11 was admitted into the facility in 2024. During the initial tour of the facility on 1/27/25 at 9:59 AM, the resident's urine collection bag was observed by the foot of the bed with no privacy bag. The urine collection bag was visible from the hallway of the unit where the resident resided. The Registered Nurse (RN #2) who was currently assigned to Resident #11, was interviewed on 1/27/25 at 10 AM. […]