Everett Transitional Care Services
Everett, Washington · CCN 505533
11 surveys since 2020, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 51
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 62
- Ownership
- Non profit - Other
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Snohomish
- Medicare-certified since
- 2020
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 43 facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Washington.
Last survey on record
May 15, 2026
178 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.26 | 4.67 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.32 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 56.8% | 48.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $9,347 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G210.5% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1052.6% | E736.8% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6251×
Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
- F6571×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6771×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6841×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Everett Transitional Care Services, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jul 12, 2022
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 2 residents (4), reviewed for resident-to-resident altercations. The facility failed to ensure residents were free from repeated verbal abuse and unwanted touching, resulting in psychosocial harm to Resident 4 who verbally stated they were scared of Resident 1, and placed all other residents at risk for further abuse. This constituted an Immediate Jeopardy. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) related to abuse was called on 06/30/2022 at 5:28 PM. The facility assessed all current residents, completed thorough investigations of incidents, and reported to the proper state offices. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 15, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent an accident for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 1) reviewed for burns. Resident 1 experienced harm when facility staff heated food and then failed to ensure safe temperatures prior to serving the resident, resulting in second degree burns. The facility failed to report to the appropriate state agencies at the time of the incident. This failure also placed other residents at risk of serious injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of a facility policy titled Microwave Reheating Guidelines updated 10/01/2022 showed; Policy Statement: Foods and fluids heated in the microwave are served to residents at safe temperatures- 7. Temperature is taken prior to service to the residents. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jul 26, 2023
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess the increased risk for skin breakdown and implement timely interventions necessary to prevent the development of facility acquired pressure ulcers for 1 of 2 residents (Residents 1) reviewed for pressure ulcers (PU). These failed practices caused harm to Resident 1, who developed an unstageable PU and placed other residents at risk for potential skin breakdown. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Skin Assessment, showed a full body, head to toe skin assessment would be conducted by a nurse upon admission to the facility and weekly thereafter. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF726Feb 8, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing assistant competencies were assessed and completed yearly, for four of four staff (F, R, S, and U) employee files reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to negatively affect the competency of the nursing assistants and impact the quality of care provided to residents. Findings included . Staff F, Nursing Assistant Certified (NAC), had a hire date of 10/12/2014. A review of the employee file showed no documentation of a yearly skills checklist having been performed in the last year. Staff R, NAC, had a hire date of 02/15/2021. A review of the employee file showed no documentation of a yearly skills checklist having been performed in the last year. Staff S, NAC, had a hire date of 06/12/2020. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Jul 12, 2022
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform thorough, annual review of the facility-wide assessment to evaluate and identify the resources required to meet each resident's care and service needs. These failures placed all residents at risk of unidentified and/or unmet care and service needs. Findings included . Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, dated 08/18/2021, updated April 21, 2022, showed the purpose of the assessment was to determine what resources were necessary to provide competent support and care for their resident population every day and during emergencies. The assessment was not thoroughly and comprehensively reviewed annually. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 51 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 15, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 15, 2025Standard3 findings
- Feb 14, 2025Standard9 findings
- Apr 1, 2024Standard5 findings
- Jul 26, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 8, 2023Standard and complaint18 findings
- Sep 29, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jul 12, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- Oct 8, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Nov 18, 2020Complaint2 findings
- May 19, 2020Standard5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction