Emerson Health & Rehabilitation
Spokane, Washington · CCN 505441
30 surveys since 2011, 11 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 149
- Surveys
- 30
- Harm or worse
- 11
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 99
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Spokane
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 52 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Washington.
Last survey on record
Jul 28, 2025
469 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.92 | 4.01 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.76 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 50.0% | 41.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2666.7% | E820.5% | F512.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6452×
PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6882×
Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Emerson Health & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF880Jan 4, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to effectively implement actions to contain the spread of COVID-19, a highly contagious virus, by: 1) Failure to cohort residents (placing residents in a separate room/unit during infection outbreaks) who tested positive for COVID-19, in order to prevent transmission to residents without COVID-19 infections. 2) Failure to implement a system that ensured all healthcare personnel and/or essential visitors were screened for COVID-19, prior to being allowed to access resident care areas. 3) Failure to maintain an infection prevention and control program which demonstrated ongoing analysis and trending of COVID-19 infections. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Apr 8, 2021
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sample residents (Resident 4), was free from verbal and physical abuse. This failure resulted in actual harm to the resident, who experienced a fall with a [CONDITION(S)], as a result of rough handling by a nursing assistant, who also verbally abused the resident during the transfer. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse-Washington, revised on 08/2019, showed abuse was defined as the willful infliction of injury with resulting physical harm. Willful was further defined as an individual who acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 8, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments and a care plan for falls were timely and accurate, and failed to implement appropriate supervision to prevent falls for one of five sample residents (Resident 1), reviewed for falls. These failures resulted in actual harm to Resident 1, who sustained a [CONDITION(S)] during an unwitnessed fall. Findings included . Review of the 01/26/21 annual assessment showed Resident 1 was alert and oriented, required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers due to unsteadiness, and had prior falls in the facility. Per the electronic medical record, the resident was last assessed for falls on 01/24/2020. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Jul 28, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DNS) did not serve as a charge nurse when the facility had an average daily occupancy over 60. This failure placed all residents at risk of lack of oversight for care provided, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] showed the facility's average daily census was 75-80. The assessment identified Staff B as the DNS. The staffing plan showed the facility required one DNS to meet the care requirements of the facility resident population during day-to-day operations and during emergencies. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 28, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure gloves were changed and hand hygiene was completed when indicated during the lunch meal service, foods were served at the appropriate temperatures and food was labeled and dated as required. The facility further failed to maintain the required dish washing machine temperatures. These failures placed residents at risk for food-borne illnesses. Findings included .<Expired/undated food>During an observation on 07/21/2025 at 9:58 AM, the refrigerator on the Tucson Hall dining room revealed three frozen drinks. There was a name on one of the drinks, the other two drinks were not labeled and none of the drinks had dates of when they had been placed in the freezer. […]
Read 31 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 31 of 149 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 28, 2025Standard14 findings
- Mar 29, 2024Standard14 findings
- Oct 24, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Feb 28, 2023Standard and complaint10 findings
- Oct 27, 2022Complaint3 findings
- May 12, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Mar 15, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jan 18, 2022Complaint4 findings
Show the 22 earlier surveys
- Sep 2, 2021Infection control2 findings
- Apr 27, 2021Complaint4 findings
- Apr 8, 2021Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 4, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 6, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 18, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Sep 5, 2019Standard18 findings
- Jun 14, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 31, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 15, 2019Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 20, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Oct 17, 2018Standard12 findings
- Nov 9, 2017Standard18 findings · 3 harm
- Oct 5, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jul 11, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Mar 28, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Sep 1, 2016Standard and complaint10 findings
- Dec 22, 2015Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 14, 2015Standard and complaint4 findings
- Sep 9, 2014Standard6 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 19, 2013—1 finding
- Jun 24, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction