Eldon Nursing & Rehab
Eldon, Missouri · CCN 265555
24 surveys since 2011, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 78
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 90
- Ownership
- For profit - Individual
- Chain
- JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN
- County
- Miller · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1993
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 113 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
Feb 26, 2026
256 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.36 | 3.32 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.33 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 77.6% | 60.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $79,671 across 3 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J13.1% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G39.4% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1237.5% | E1134.4% | F39.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C26.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6573×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Eldon Nursing & Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jan 23, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide protective oversight for one cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1) with a history of elopement, when facility staff left the transport van keys in the vehicle and the resident with a history of exit seeking, wandering and elopement attempts eloped from the facility, got into the facility van, and drove nine miles. Facility staff were not aware the resident was missing. The facility census was 63. The administrator was notified on 1/22/25 at 3:17 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 1/18/25. The IJ was removed on 1/22/25, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jul 2, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) remained free from physical abuse when Resident #2 with a history of physical aggression punched Resident #1 in the face which resulted in bruising to his/her eye. The facility census was 65.Review of the facility's abuse and neglect policy, undated, showed staff are directed that each resident will be free from Abuse. Abuse can include verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation, corporal punishment or involuntary seclusion. Residents will be protected from abuse, neglect, and harm while they are residing at the facility. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600May 20, 2024
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to implement interventions for one resident (Resident #2), with a history of similar behaviors, which failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) remained free from sexual abuse, when Resident #2 put his/her hand down Resident #1's pants without Resident #1's consent. The facility census was 65. 1. Review of the facility's abuse and neglect policy, undated, showed it is the policy of this facility that each resident will be free from Abuse. Abuse can include verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation, corporal punishment or involuntary seclusion. Additionally, residents will be protected from abuse, neglect, and harm while they are residing at the facility. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF580Mar 29, 2024
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to notify one resident's (Resident #1's) out of three sampled residents physician of the resident's blood glucose (the main sugar found in your blood) results over 400 milligrams (mg) per deciliter (dL) results in a timely manner which resulted in the resident being admitted to the local hospital for diabetic ketoacidosis (a complication of diabetes in which acids build up in the blood to levels that can be life-threatening). The census was 57. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed the facility did not have a policy to direct staff on when to notify the physician for changes in resident conditions. 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Feb 26, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to use appropriate infection control procedures to prevent the spread of bacteria or other infectious causing contaminants during perineal and/or wound care, when staff failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene, and glove changes for three residents (Resident #1, #6, and #34 ), of five sampled residents, Facility staff failed to ensure sanitary conditions for catheter tubing when they failed to keep the tubing off the floor for three residents (Resident #2, #48, and #54) out of three sampled residents. Facility staff failed to post Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) signs for five residents (Resident #2, #23, #31, #48, and #54) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 53.1. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 78 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 26, 2026Standard7 findings
- Nov 19, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Jul 2, 2025Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 23, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 24, 2024Standard4 findings
- May 20, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 29, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 30, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- Jun 2, 2023Standard9 findings
- Dec 17, 2021Standard5 findings
- Jun 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Oct 11, 2019Standard4 findings
- Jan 23, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Aug 3, 2018Standard4 findings
- Apr 11, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Aug 25, 2017Standard2 findings
- Oct 7, 2016Standard5 findings
- Jul 16, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 14, 2014Standard3 findings
- Jan 30, 2014—5 findings
- Feb 4, 2013—8 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 28, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 13, 2012—1 finding
- Dec 14, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction