Elderwood at Lockport
Lockport, New York · CCN 335500
14 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 49
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 126
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- ELDERWOOD
- County
- Niagara
- Medicare-certified since
- 1976
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 13, 2026
241 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.54 | 3.37 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.70 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 51.5% | 47.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $113,320 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G110.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D770.0% | E110.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B110.0% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6891×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F7251×
Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Elderwood at Lockport, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 13, 2026
Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained as free of accidents as possible, and that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (1) (Resident #1) of three (3) residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, on 12/24/2025, the facility failed to use two (2)-person bed mobility assistance, from lying to sitting on the edge of the bed, resulting in Resident #1 falling to the floor, sustaining a left hip fracture requiring an open reduction internal fixation (ORIF-surgical procedure to realign and secure broken bones with metal fasteners). This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 that is not Immediate Jeopardy. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Jun 6, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during Complaint investigations (#NY00309961, #NY00316113) during the Standard survey completed on 6/6/23, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for three (East, West, North Units) of three resident care units. Specifically, the facility did not have adequate nursing staff based on the facility's established minimum number of staff for each unit and each shift. There was lack of answering resident call lights timely and providing toileting/incontinence care as planned. Resident's beds were not made, and residents didn't receive their medication on the East Unit the evening of 6/4/23. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677May 2, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 5/2/25, the facility did not ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one (1) (Resident #6) of two (2) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #6 had a moderate amount of unwanted facial hair on their upper lip, chin, and neck. The finding is: The policy titled A.M. Care, dated 4/10/2018, documented AM (morning)care will be provided for all residents in preparation for breakfast and the daily routine. Part of AM care included assisting with grooming needs: shave or clip facial hair. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880May 2, 2025
Based on interview, observation, and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 5/2/25, the facility did not ensure that they established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (1) (Resident #54) of four (4) residents observed for infection prevention and control during care. Specifically, staff did not wear personal protective equipment including gowns while providing incontinent care for Resident #54 who had ESBLs (extended spectrum beta-lactamase-an infection caused by antibiotic resistant bacterial enzymes) in their urine. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Jun 6, 2023
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a Standard survey completed on 6/6/23, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for one (Resident #66) of two residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not ensure Resident #1 was treated with respect and dignity by a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) while providing morning care. The finding is: The policy and procedure (P&P) titled Dignity dated 8/1/19, documented each resident has the right to be treated with dignity and respect. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 49 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 13, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 2, 2025Standard2 findings
- Jun 6, 2023Standard and complaint5 findings
- Nov 22, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Jul 30, 2021Standard2 findings
- Oct 28, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 3, 2019Standard1 finding
- Feb 12, 2018Standard7 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Nov 8, 2016Standard4 findings
- Sep 3, 2015Standard9 findings
- Sep 23, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jul 18, 2014Standard8 findings
- Jun 8, 2012—3 findings
- Jun 22, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction