El Reposo Nursing Facility
Florence, Alabama · CCN 015402
5 surveys since 2014. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 12
- Surveys
- 5
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Lauderdale
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jul 3, 2024
859 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.78 | 3.90 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.45 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 42.4% | 46.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D250.0% | E— | F125.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C125.0% |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at El Reposo Nursing Facility, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jul 3, 2024
Based on interviews, record reviews, the facility's policy titled, Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation, Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs) received by the Alabama State Survey Agency, and the facility's investigative files, the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from sexual perpetrated another other residents. On 02/24/2024, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #8 entered Resident Identifier (RI) #40's room and saw RI #212 in the room leaned over RI #40 whose shirt was pulled up. RI #212's face near RI #40's breast. CNA #8 said it appeared that RI #212's mouth was on RI #40's breast. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 3, 2024
Based on observations, interviews and the facility's policy titled, Labeling and Dating Foods (Date Marking), the facility failed to ensure out of date food was discarded on 06/30/2024 during the initial kitchen observation. This had the potential to affect 57 of 57 residents receiving food from the kitchen. Findings include: A facility's policy titled, Labeling and Dating Foods (Date Marking), documented, . Procedure: . 2. Date marking for refrigerated storage food items . *Once opened, all ready to eat, potentially hazardous food will be re-dated with a use by date according to current safe food storage guidelines . 4. […]
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 3, 2024Standard and complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 13, 2018Standard3 findings
- Apr 20, 2017Standard1 finding
- Apr 7, 2016Standard3 findings
- Apr 24, 2014Standard3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction