Edward J Healey Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Riviera Beach, Florida · CCN 105838
16 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 49
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- Government - County
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Palm Beach
- Medicare-certified since
- 1993
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).
Last survey on record
May 21, 2026
172 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.56 | 5.29 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.97 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 6.4% | 46.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D6100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Edward J Healey Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686May 21, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent the development of new pressure ulcers, as evidenced by, failure to implement the physician's order for soft boots and to properly document the resident's refusal of them for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #6). The findings included:Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Prevention of Pressure Injury, revised on 04/2020 documented, 1. Interventions will be implemented in accordance with practitioner's orders, including the type of devices to be used, and the frequency of performing the tasks. 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF688May 21, 2026
Based on observation, interview, policy review and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain range of motion for 2 of 4 sampled residents, as evidenced by failure to follow a physician's order for use of self-feeding adaptive equipment for Resident #84, and failure to provide bilateral boots for contracture prevention for Resident #76. The findings included:1) Review of the policy titled, Use of Assistive Devices-Procedure effective date 05/15/20, documented, in part, 1. Assistive devices include: f. Orthotic or prosthetic equipment, g. Eating utensils 3. The facility will provide assistive devise for residents who need them. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF700May 21, 2026
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to properly complete quarterly assessments for bed rails/assist bars for 3 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #20, Resident #57 and Resident #81). The findings included:Review of the State Operations Manual (SOM) revealed the definition of Bed Rails are adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed. They are available in a variety of types, shapes, and sizes ranging from full to one-half, one-quarter, or one-eighth lengths. Also, some bed rails are not designed as part of the bed by the manufacturer and may be installed on or used along the side of a bed. Examples of bed rails include, but are not limited to: Side rails, bed side rails, safety rails; Grab bars and assist bars. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880May 21, 2026
Based on policy review, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained sterile technique during tracheostomy care and suctioning as evidenced by improper handling of sterile supplies, failure to prevent contamination of the sterile field, failure to change gloves after contact with potentially contaminated surfaces and equipment. This deficient practice had the potential for increased risk for infection for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #52); and failed to change gloves during wound care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #28).The findings included:The facility policy titled Tracheostomy Care and Suction Policy and Procedure, dated 05/04/26, indicated the purpose of the policy was to establish standardized, evidence based best practices for… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF810Dec 12, 2024
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive equipment for a resident when consuming liquids for 1 out of 2 sampled residents reviewed for adaptive equipment, affecting Resident #6. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Adaptive Feeding Equipment Policy and Procedure, with an effective date of 09/25/24, included in part, the following: To provide adaptive equipment to obtain and/or maintain a resident highest practicable level. Residents requiring assistance in feeding are potential candidates for a restorative dining program or adaptive utensil use, as determined by the occupational therapist. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 49 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 21, 2026Standard4 findings
- Dec 12, 2024Standard1 finding
- Jun 3, 2022Standard1 finding
- Feb 3, 2022Complaint1 finding
- May 20, 2021Standard4 findings
- Sep 12, 2019Standard4 findings
- Feb 27, 2019Standard7 findings
- Dec 7, 2017Standard1 finding
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Oct 15, 2015Standard6 findings
- Aug 15, 2014Standard2 findings
- Sep 20, 2013—1 finding
- Jun 6, 2013—3 findings
- Apr 20, 2012—9 findings
- Mar 3, 2011—3 findings
- Dec 21, 2010—1 finding
- Sep 15, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Clifford Chester Sims State Veterans Nursing HomePanama Cityno harm findings
- Clyde E Lassen State Veterans Nursing HomeSaint Augustineno harm findings
- Baldomero Lopez Memorial Veterans Nursing HomeLand O Lakesno harm findings
- Ardie R Copas State Veterans Nursing HomePort Saint Lucieno harm findings
- Memorial ManorPembroke Pinesno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction