Dwellside Care and Rehab
Cherry Hill, New Jersey · CCN 315068
24 surveys since 2010, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 129
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 162
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Camden
- Medicare-certified since
- 1973
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 168 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New Jersey.
Last survey on record
Jan 6, 2026
307 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.48 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.20 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 67.9% | 41.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $154,466 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J24.4% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.2% | H12.2% | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2248.9% | E1840.0% | F12.2% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F7613×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8423×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Dwellside Care and Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 23, 2025
COMPLAINT #: 2599447Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 9/10/2025, 9/11/2025, 9/18/2025, and 9/23/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision of a severely cognitively impaired resident (Resident #2) with a known history of exit seeking behaviors and documented history of previous attempts to elope from their unit; who eloped form the facility on 8/23/2025. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2).A review of facility record revealed that on 8/23/2025 at approximately 8:15 AM, Resident #2 eloped from the facility while wearing a Wander Guard (WG; alarmed security bracelet) through an alarmed second floor elevator, down to the first… […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Feb 27, 2025
NJ00176090, NJ00175919, NJ00171909, NJ00169026, NJ00165303, NJ00181236, NJ00179553, NJ00179421, NJ00175629, NJ00177976, NJ00183043, NJ00167029, NJ00165390, NJ00165211, NJ00164234, NJ00181173, NJ00183473, N00183733. Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Resident (R)21, R22, and R24) were free from physical abuse by R20 out of a total sample of 32 residents. Due to the vulnerable nature of the nursing home population, the potential for serious injury or serious physical or psychosocial impairment from being physically abused by R20 existed, and the likeliness of R20 hitting another resident in the facility was high and required immediate action to prevent further events of physical abuse by R20. […]
- Actual harm, patternF697Apr 20, 2023
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to administer a physician ordered scheduled pain medication to a resident who was verbalizing pain at a level of ten (10) out of ten. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one residents, (Resident #35) reviewed for pain management and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F684E On 04/06/23 at 12:35 PM, Surveyor #1 observed Surveyor #2 talking to Resident #35 at the end of the hallway on the [NAME] unit. Surveyor #1 overheard the resident tell Surveyor #2 that he/she had not received any of his/her medications that day and their shoulders were in pain. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Feb 27, 2025
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor and assess a resident's skin around a cast and notify the physician timely when necrotic skin was found around the cast for one of one (Resident (R)14) reviewed for timely monitoring and assessments of 32 sampled residents. This failure resulted in harm when R14 was sent to the hospital, surgery was required, and a maggot infestation was found under the cast. Findings include: Review of R14's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R14 had been admitted to the facility initially on 10/14/22 with the diagnosis of dementia and diabetes mellitus. The resident passed away at the facility on 01/25/25. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 21, 2022
Complaint Intake #NJ155732 Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two-person assistance was provided with transfers in accordance with a resident's care planned needs, to prevent accidents/injuries for 1 (Resident #7) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #7, who was care planned for two-person assistance with transfers, was transferred with the assistance of only one staff member on 06/15/2022 and sustained a skin tear to the left leg. […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 129 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 6, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Sep 23, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 19, 2025Standard and complaint20 findings
- Feb 27, 2025Complaint6 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 30, 2024Complaint4 findings
- Apr 20, 2023Standard11 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 21, 2022Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- Mar 10, 2021Standard2 findings
- May 15, 2019Standard7 findings
- Aug 22, 2018Complaint2 findings
- May 8, 2018Standard5 findings
- Aug 14, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Mar 31, 2017Standard7 findings
- Jan 19, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jul 26, 2016Standard10 findings
- Jul 7, 2015Complaint1 finding
- May 20, 2015Standard2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 17, 2014Complaint4 findings
- May 2, 2014Standard and complaint6 findings
- Mar 12, 2013—16 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 6, 2012—9 findings
- Feb 10, 2011—5 findings
- Sep 24, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction