Downs Care and Rehab
Downs, Kansas · CCN 175201
16 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 66
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 45
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES
- County
- Osborne · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 108 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Kansas.
Last survey on record
Jun 24, 2026
138 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.79 | 3.78 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.02 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 35.1% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1365.0% | E210.0% | F525.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F5841×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Downs Care and Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Apr 26, 2021
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included six residents reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure four of six sampled residents were free from inappropriate touching by Resident (R) 1, who made sexual actions toward women on multiple different occasions. This deficient practice placed all 23 female residents in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - R1's physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . R1's Admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R1 had severely impaired cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five. R1 required limited assistance of one staff for transfers, walking in his room, and locomotion on the unit. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF610Apr 26, 2021
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included six residents reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect the 23 female residents that resided in the facility when R1 exhibited inappropriate touching and sexual actions on multiple different occasions. This deficient practice placed all 23 female residents in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - R1's physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . R1's Admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R1 had severely impaired cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five. R1 required limited assistance of one staff for transfers, walking in his room, and locomotion on the unit. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 24, 2026
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, distribute, and serve food by professional standards for food service safety in the facility's kitchen. The facility failed to label, seal, and date food stored in the refrigerator/freezer and dry storage area. The facility also failed to consistently log freezer/refrigerator temperatures. Findings included:- On 04/13/26 at 08:10 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed the following:A white upright freezer had approximately 1/4 inch (in) ice buildup along the inside of the freezer and the shelves.The refrigerator located in the kitchen had a plastic bag with unlabeled, undated sliced yellow cheese.The March Freezer/refrigerator temperature logs lacked documentation of the readings for the following freezers… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jun 24, 2026
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement adequate infection control practices when staff failed to change gloves during incontinent care for Resident (R) 26. Staff also failed to place Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms, which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) signage for R11 and R44's and failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE- gowns and gloves) was readily available for use for R11 and R44, who shared a room, cares. Staff also failed to provide appropriate complete urinary catheter care for R44. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Jul 31, 2024
The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the services of a full-time certified dietary manager for the 40 residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 07/29/24 at 08:30 AM, observation revealed dietary staff in the kitchen prepared the breakfast meal. On 07/29/24 at 09:40 AM, Dietary Staff BB verified she was not a certified dietary manager. Dietary Staff BB stated the facility had seven residents with mechanical soft diets and one with a pureed diet. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 66 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 24, 2026Standard6 findings
- Jul 31, 2024Standard8 findings
- Aug 18, 2022Standard4 findings
- Feb 7, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jul 15, 2021Standard2 findings
- Apr 26, 2021Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 8, 2019Standard and complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 27, 2018Standard2 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Nov 20, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Feb 1, 2017Standard8 findings
- Nov 10, 2015Standard8 findings
- Aug 26, 2014Standard4 findings
- Jun 25, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jun 12, 2013—3 findings
- Mar 14, 2012—2 findings
- Feb 21, 2011—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction