Dove Healthcare - Osseo
Osseo, Wisconsin · CCN 525709
12 surveys since 2012, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 50
- Surveys
- 12
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 46
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- DOVE HEALTHCARE
- County
- Trempealeau · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2013
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Feb 25, 2026
257 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.11 | 3.73 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.35 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 68.3% | 45.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D333.3% | E444.4% | F222.2% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6882×
Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
- F6071×
Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
- F6861×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F6891×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F7001×
Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Dove Healthcare - Osseo, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF761Feb 25, 2026
Based on observations and record review, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional practice. This had the potential to affect stock medication that could be used for all residents. Currently there are 15 out of 31 residents (R) needing medication requiring temperature control for proper storage. (R3, R4, R5, R11, R12, R13, R19, R20, R21, R24, R27, R28, R33, R40, R41)Routine monitoring of temperature levels of medication refrigerators in both medication rooms is not consistently being done. There were 3 narcotics, 39 insulin pens, 5 other injectable types, 161 vaccines, 10 suppositories, and 3 ophthalmic suspensions that are temperature sensitive found in medication storage. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Feb 25, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility has not established an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections Laundry Aide failed to follow infection prevention procedures while handling clean linen. This has the potential to affect all 31 residents (R) in the facility.Registered Nurse (RN) failed to clean tip of insulin pen prior to attaching a needle and administering insulin to 1 out of 3 residents observed for insulin administration. (R4)RN failed to clean the glucometer after use, prior to putting away, during 2 out of 3 resident observations of diabetic care. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF688Feb 25, 2026
Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure residents with limited range of motion (ROM) received services to maintain or prevent further reduction in ROM for 6 out of 6 residents (R) receiving restorative services. R3, R4, R5, R8, R15, and R23Facility has only one trained restorative aide and no back up aide if the restorative aide does not work. Residents do not receive consistent restorative services.This is evidenced by:The facility policy, titled Restorative Nursing Program, dated 2/2026 states:Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide maintenance and restorative services designed to maintain or improve a resident's abilities to the highest practicable level.3. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF688Oct 18, 2023
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure residents received appropriate treatment and services to maintain or prevent further reduction in range of motion (ROM) and mobility for 5 of 5 residents (R) (R11, R13, R16, R3, R17). The facility did not consistently provide services or treatment for residents (R11, R13, R16, R3, R17) identified with having a restorative program. This is evidenced by: Example 1 R11 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses that includes a stroke, Alzheimer's disease, and hemiplegia. R11's most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicates is severely impaired - never/rarely makes decision and has an activated Power of Attorney (POA) 5/16/23. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700Oct 18, 2023
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure prior to the installation or use of bed rails, attempted to use alternative devices, assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails, obtain consent with the resident or resident representative for review of risks and benefits of bed rails for 8 of 8 residents (R) R12, R13, R16, R27, R3, R4, R14, R22) observed with side rails/enabler bars during the survey process. The facility failed to attempt alternatives prior to installation of grab bars and failed to obtain informed signed consent of risk and benefit for grab bars with the resident or resident representative for R12, R13, R16, R27, R3, R4, R14, and R22. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 50 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 25, 2026Standard4 findings
- Oct 18, 2023Standard5 findings
- Jun 30, 2021Standard2 findings
- Sep 29, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Jun 5, 2019Standard5 findings
- Aug 28, 2018Complaint1 finding
- May 18, 2017Standard2 findings
- May 26, 2016Standard2 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
- Jul 16, 2015Standard4 findings
- Sep 4, 2014Standard3 findings
- Nov 27, 2013—2 findings
- Oct 31, 2012—18 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction