Deficiency Index

Dove Healthcare - Lodi

Lodi, Wisconsin · CCN 525520

31 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
152
Surveys
31
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
5
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy5

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file24/31

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
DOVE HEALTHCARE
County
Columbia
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 92 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Wisconsin.

Last survey on record

Jul 14, 2026

118 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.263.73
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.62—
Annual nurse turnover62.1%45.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$14,433 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ14.3%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1565.2%E313.0%F417.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 152 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5801×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F5831×

    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Dove Healthcare - Lodi, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF686Aug 26, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives cares, consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure injuries (PIs) for 2 of 3 residents (R) sampled out of a total sample of 9 (R2 and R8). R8 was admitted on [DATE], without a pressure injury or catheter. R8 was hospitalized on [DATE], returning on [DATE] with a foley catheter in place. The facility did not develop a care plan addressing the catheter until [DATE], after erosion to the penis was identified.The facility failed to ensure interventions to prevent medically related pressure injuries (PI) were implemented correctly to prevent PI development, failed to complete weekly measurements and assessments, and failed to get orders for treatments. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF580Mar 30, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not promptly consult with the physician when 1 of 3 residents reviewed (R1) of a total sample of 5 residents had a significant change in condition following a fall from bed. On [DATE], R1 fell approximately four feet from his bed to the floor when a certified nursing assistant provided care without assistance of a second person, as directed in R1's care plan. The nurse failed to consult with an MD before moving R1 off of the floor or inform the physician of a change in R1's pain level compared to baseline. Later, when R1 experienced acute changes in mental status, pain, and oxygen saturation levels, the nurse failed to promptly consult with a physician. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Mar 30, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received the necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet each resident's physical needs for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (R1) of a total sample of 5 residents. After R1 fell four feet from the bed to the floor, the licensed practical nurse (LPN) failed to follow professional standards of practice as outlined in N6, Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act. The LPN did not report the fall to a registered nurse (RN) so the RN could perform a complete comprehensive assessment before determining whether R1 could be moved off the floor and perform ongoing monitoring and assessment of R1's condition. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Mar 30, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents in 1 of 3 residents reviewed for fall concerns, out of a total sample of 5 (R1). On [DATE] a certified nursing assistant attempted to provide care to R1 without waiting for a second person to assist, as directed in R1's care plan. R1 rolled off the bed and fell approximately 4 ft. to the floor. R1 suffered multiple fractures as a result of the fall and expired at the hospital. This created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE]. The NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 11:00 AM. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 10, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (R8) reviewed for wandering, 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for abuse, and 2 of 4 residents (R1 and R6) reviewed for falls. R8 was assessed as a high risk to wander. R8's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R8 wandered in the previous 1-3 days. R8 has long and short-term cognitive impairment and has severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. R8 wore a Wander Guard bracelet. R8 was known to wander throughout the facility on a regular basis, especially on the PM shift. […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 152 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 14, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 18, 2026Standard5 findings
  • Jun 13, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 27, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Aug 26, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 29, 2023Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Mar 29, 2023Complaint11 findings
Show the 23 earlier surveys
  • Oct 10, 2022Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • May 24, 2022Standard24 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 24, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 29, 2021Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Mar 30, 2021Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Aug 24, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 1, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Feb 18, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • May 14, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Mar 13, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 7, 2018Standard8 findings
  • Dec 18, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 26, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Jan 18, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 15, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 6, 2016Standard12 findings
  • Mar 25, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Sep 3, 2014Complaint5 findings
  • Jun 5, 2014Standard9 findings
  • Feb 12, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 2, 2013—7 findings
  • Aug 1, 2012—9 findings
  • May 17, 2011—4 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction