Dock Terrace
Lansdale, Pennsylvania · CCN 395557
9 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 19
- Surveys
- 9
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 72
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Montgomery
- Medicare-certified since
- 1982
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=3, floor 20).
Last survey on record
—
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.59 | 4.44 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.14 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 26.7% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Dock Terrace, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF688Nov 4, 2021
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services to increase or prevent a reduction in range of motion (ROM) for one of two sampled residents with limitations in ROM. (Resident 25) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 25 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident 25 had a limitation in range of motion to both sides of her lower extremities (hip, knee, ankle, foot). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF805Nov 4, 2021
Based on review of the dietary manual, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for three of ten sampled residents who were on a mechanically altered diet. (Residents 5, 31, 60) Findings include: Review of the facility diet manual for modified menus, dated September 3, 2021, revealed that hot dogs should be in chopped form when served to residents ordered a mechanically altered diet that included chopped meats and that beef roast should be in chopped form when served to residents ordered a mechanically altered diet that included chopped meats. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF812Nov 4, 2021
Based on review of facility policy and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions on one of three nursing units. (Ivy Lane) Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Use and Storage of Resident Obtained Foods-HC, dated June 25, 2021, revealed that when a resident chose to consume food at the facility that was not obtained by the facility, safe and sanitary use, storage, and handling shall be maintained as follows: foods requiring refrigeration would be labeled with the residents name, dated, and placed in a designated refrigerator or freezer. Unconsumed foods would be disposed of as follows or upon evidence of spoilage: leftover food discarded after three days. Frozen items would be discarded after 30 days. […]
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 4, 2021Standard3 findings
- Nov 25, 2020Standard1 finding
- Jul 12, 2019Standard3 findings
- Jun 8, 2018Standard3 findings
- Jun 23, 2016Standard2 findings
- Aug 1, 2014Standard1 finding
- Jul 31, 2013—3 findings
- Jun 22, 2012—1 finding
Show the 1 earlier survey
- Jul 14, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction