Deficiency Index

Diversicare of Marion

Marion, Alabama · CCN 015158

12 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
45
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2022
’11’15’20’22
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
71
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE
County
Perry · rural
Medicare-certified since
1977

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Aug 19, 2022

1,543 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.963.90
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.47—
Annual nurse turnover47.4%46.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD5100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 5 of the 45 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Diversicare of Marion, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF607Oct 20, 2022

    Based on interviews, record review, review of the facility's abuse investigation, and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation, Exploitation Policy, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #3, Social Service Director, implemented immediate protective measures in accordance with the facility's abuse policy upon witnessing EI #4, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) both verbally and physically abuse Resident Identifier (RI) #1 on 09/13/2022. On 9/13/2022 at approximately 12:50 PM, EI #3, the Social Services Director, was on the Memory Care Unit and heard a loud noise, described as the sound of a chair scraping against the floor. EI #3 turned and saw RI #1 rise up halfway to a standing position from his/her chair. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Oct 20, 2022

    Based on interviews, record review, review of the facility's abuse investigation, and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation, Exploitation Policy, the facility failed to protect Resident Identifier (RI) #1's right to be free from verbal and physical abuse. On 9/13/2022 at approximately 12:50 PM, Employee Identifier (EI) #3, the Social Services Director, was on the Memory Care Unit and heard a loud noise, described as the sound of a chair scraping against the floor. EI #3 turned and saw RI #1 rise up halfway to a standing position from his/her chair. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF561Aug 19, 2022

    Based on interviews, record review, and review of a facility policy titled, Rights of Nursing Facility Residents, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #56 was offered a bathing method other than bed baths to promote the resident's right to choose. This deficient practice affected RI #56, one of two sampled residents for choices. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Rights of Nursing Facility Residents, dated 05/01/2012, revealed, . every nursing facility resident had the right . To receive all care necessary to have the highest possible level of health. RI #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #56 has diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF644Apr 8, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) program by failing to update a level I screen when a new [DIAGNOSES REDACTED].#30) of three (3) residents reviewed for PASARR out of 17 sampled residents. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Review of the Level I PASARR Screening and Results document for Resident #30 revealed it was completed on 1/13/2020 by hospital staff prior to admission. This screen did not note a [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF645Apr 8, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a level II Pre-admission Screening and Record Review (PASARR) evaluation as required when a level I screening determined a level II to be necessary for one (1) (Resident #40) of three (3) reviewed for PASARR out of 17 sampled residents. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a recent readmission date of [DATE]. [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Review of the PASARR file for Resident #40 revealed a level I PASARR was completed on 6/18/19, prior to admission and did not require a level II evaluation. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 45 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Oct 20, 2022Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 19, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Apr 8, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Feb 13, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Mar 8, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Jan 26, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Dec 17, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Dec 4, 2014Standard4 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Jan 19, 2014—14 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 7, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 24, 2012—8 findings
  • Feb 10, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction