Deficiency Index

Diamondback Healthcare Center

Phoenix, Arizona · CCN 035302

7 surveys since 2023, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
11
Surveys
7
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2023–2026
’23’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Citations on record11

Across 7 surveys carrying at least one finding.

The facility

Certified beds
94
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
Independent
County
Maricopa
Medicare-certified since
2022

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
4
Staffing
1
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Feb 6, 2026

276 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.914.22
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.58—
Annual nurse turnover72.1%45.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$5,073 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD880.0%E220.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 11 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Diamondback Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Dec 5, 2025

    Based on clinical record review, interviews and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered within the physician ordered parameters for Resident #09. The deficient practice may result in medications being administered outside physician ordered parameters.Findings Include:Resident # 09 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypotension, dependence on respirator (ventilator) status, and bradycardia. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF695Aug 14, 2024

    Based on personnel record reviews, facility documentation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staffs had competencies or skills needed to provide care for 8 residents on ventilator and tracheostomy. The facility census was 75. The deficient practice could result in patients with ventilator and tracheostomy (Vent/ Trach) not receiving care that they need. Findings include: Review of the Vent/Trach Census revealed eight (8) residents identified with a tracheotomy, ventilator or both a tracheotomy and ventilator. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF812Feb 6, 2026

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that food is labeled and dated after opening in accordance with professional food safety standards. The deficient practice may result in practices of food storage that may not be in accordance with professional food safety standards. Findings include:An observation of the kitchen was conducted on January 4, 2026, at 8:40 AM with the facility's Dietary Manager (DM/Staff #152). The following food items were discovered without labels indicating what date they had been opened: Two liquid egg cartons did not have an opened date label.One bag of chicken tenders in the freezer without opened date label.One bag of tilapia in the freezer had no opened date label. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Feb 6, 2026

    Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention and control practices were implemented related to contact precautions for one resident of 5 residents (#117) and the facility failed to ensure that community infection control surveillance mapping was documented. The deficient practice could result in transmission of infection in the facility.Findings include: -Regarding Contact Precautions: Resident #117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (C. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF583Jan 29, 2026

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident-identifiable information was maintained confidentially and protected from public view for one Resident (#29). This deficient practice resulted in the exposure of protected health information (PHI) to an unauthorized individual and could result in a violation of residents' rights to privacy and confidentiality. Findings include:An observation conducted on January 29, 2026, at 10:45 a.m. revealed an unattended computer workstation with resident records actively displayed on the monitor. No facility staff were present or monitoring the workstation at the time of the observation. […]

Read all 11 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 6, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Jan 29, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 7, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 31, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Aug 14, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 5, 2023Standard1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction