Delmar Gardens North
Black Jack, Missouri · CCN 265325
28 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 124
- Surveys
- 28
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 240
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- DELMAR GARDENS
- County
- St. Louis
- Medicare-certified since
- 1988
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 75 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
Nov 17, 2025
357 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.56 | 3.15 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.18 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 42.9% | 58.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $39,299 across 1 penalty
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.9% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G25.9% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2058.8% | E926.5% | F25.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6933×
Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6102×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Delmar Gardens North, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 10, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment as free of accident hazards as possible and to provide supervision and assistance to prevent falls for five of seven sampled residents (Residents #1, #3, #4, #5 and #6) by not implementing care planned fall interventions. On 12/31/24 Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A failed to place Resident #1's bed in a low position. Resident #1 was found screaming and hanging off the bed holding onto the grab rail. A nurse assisted the resident to the floor. The resident sustained bilateral (both sides) fractured femurs (thighbones). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF610Nov 2, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed their Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, Freedom From policy by failing to immediately notify the Administrator/Designee or Director of Nurses (DON)/Designee and promptly begin an investigation regarding one resident's allegation on 10/24/23 around 4:30 P.M. to 5:00 P.M., of being slapped or hit in the face/mouth by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A. In addition, the facility failed to ensure CNA A was immediately suspended from work pending the results of an investigation. CNA A continued to work on 10/24/23 until 10:38 P.M., returned to the facility on [DATE], and worked from 6:34 A.M. until 3:27 P.M., before being suspended from work. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Nov 2, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed their Condition Change, of the Resident policy. On the morning of 10/9/23, Nurse O (the day shift nurse) documented the night shift nurse reported at shift change one resident had a low blood pressure (BP), the physician was notified and gave orders to encourage fluids. The night shift nurse failed to document in the progress notes and/or on an SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation, assessment tool) communication form, the date or time the resident's BP was low, what the BP was, or the physician's order. In addition, Nurse O failed to document on-going assessments/monitoring of the resident throughout the day. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 6, 2023
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. the high temperature dish machine met proper temperatures and 2. the staff maintained a clean kitchen including items in the storage areas for all 133 residents who received meals from the kitchen. These failures had the potential to lead to food-borne illness among all facility residents. Findings include: 1.Observations during the initial tour of the kitchen on 10/02/23 beginning at 9:31 AM with the Food Service Director (FSD) revealed: The hot water dishwasher temperatures of Wash was 152 Fahrenheit (F), the Rinse was 154 F, and the Final Rinse was 190F. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Nov 17, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated with dignity and respect, ensuring their comfort, privacy, and personal rights are always upheld, when staff did not knock or announce their presence before entering the rooms of Residents #36, #50, #72, and #84, violating their right to privacy, when Residents #1, #2 and #28 were not provided with call lights within reach, limiting their ability to communicate their needs promptly and when staff failed to adjust the dining room temperature to a comfortable level, compromising their comfort for Residents #26, #72, #145, and #164. This affected the dignity standards to guarantee residents' physical comfort, autonomy, and respect in daily care for nine of 36 sampled residents. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 124 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 17, 2025Standard6 findings
- Feb 10, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 26, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Nov 2, 2023Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 6, 2023Standard8 findings
- Feb 3, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Aug 30, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 20 earlier surveys
- Jun 15, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Aug 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jun 30, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Apr 19, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Nov 5, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jan 8, 2020Standard13 findings
- Jun 6, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Feb 21, 2019Standard20 findings
- Mar 21, 2018Standard14 findings
- Dec 1, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Feb 17, 2017Standard10 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 28, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 24, 2015Standard4 findings
- Dec 5, 2014Standard4 findings
- Sep 17, 2013—9 findings
- Jul 2, 2013—1 finding
- Oct 15, 2012—4 findings
- Mar 29, 2012—2 findings
- Nov 23, 2011—7 findings
- Jan 7, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction