Deerfield Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Delhi, Louisiana · CCN 195393
22 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 95
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 103
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Richland
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 82 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Louisiana.
Last survey on record
Oct 16, 2025
389 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.36 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.28 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 56.3% | 45.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,281 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J14.0% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1144.0% | E1352.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F7263×
Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F7572×
Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Deerfield Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 23, 2025
Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible by not locking the door to the kitchen giving residents direct and full access to the kitchen and the ability to elope from the facility through an exterior door at the back of the kitchen for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for elopement.This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for Resident #1 on 08/29/2025 at 11:35 p.m. when Resident #1 exited out of the facility. Resident #1 was able to access the kitchen through an unlocked kitchen door, walk through the kitchen and leave through an exterior door at the back of the kitchen. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Jul 22, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a person-centered care plan was implemented for each resident by failing to implement the care plan for 1 (#61) of 1 resident reviewed who had a PEG tube. Findings:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #61 had an admit date of 05/07/2024 with diagnoses which included dementia, gastrostomy, schizophrenia and anxiety. Review of the July 2026 physician's orders revealed that Resident #61 had a PEG tube. The physician ordered that the dry dressing at the PEG tube site was to be changed daily and as needed. Review of Resident #61's care plan also indicated that the dry dressing at the PEG tube site was to be changed daily and as needed. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677Jul 22, 2026
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene. The facility failed to ensure: 1). a resident received feeding assistance during a meal for 1 (#7) resident reviewed for nutrition, and 2). a resident's fingernails were groomed in a timely manner for 1 (#10) resident reviewed for ADL care.Findings: Resident #10 Review of Resident #10's record revealed an admission date of 10/11/2023 with diagnoses of dementia with unspecified severity and severe intellectual disability. Review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 99 which indicated the resident was unable to complete the interview. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jul 22, 2026
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure it maintained an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment. The facility failed to ensure: 1). biohazard trash in a resident's room was covered with a lid for 1 (#1) resident reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions, and 2). resident care equipment was stored and/or labeled properly for 2 (#27, #44) residents.Findings: Resident #27 On 07/20/2026 at 8:43 a.m., 07/21/2026 at 8:30 a.m., and 07/22/2026 at 8:30 a.m., observations of Resident #27's bathroom revealed his urinal was placed on a safety rail and the urinal was not labeled with his name or stored in a bag. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF921Jul 22, 2026
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. The deficient practice affected 1 (#51) resident and had the potential to affect all 63 residents that resided in the facility.Findings: Hall 2: On 07/20/2026 at 10:35 a.m. and 07/21/2026 at 8:56 a.m., observations of Hall 2 soiled utility room revealed the door was unlocked and there were towels soiled with a pink substance on the floor on both sides of the hopper sink. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 95 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 22, 2026Standard7 findings
- Oct 16, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Sep 23, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- May 14, 2025Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jun 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 11, 2024Standard7 findings
- May 10, 2023Standard5 findings
- May 11, 2022Standard4 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Apr 22, 2021Standard4 findings
- Jul 24, 2019Standard6 findings
- Jun 14, 2018Standard and complaint10 findings
- Jul 13, 2017Standard2 findings
- Dec 15, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Sep 1, 2016Standard8 findings
- Oct 2, 2015Standard1 finding
- Nov 20, 2014Standard5 findings
- Feb 6, 2014—1 finding
- Dec 12, 2013Standard6 findings
- Jul 1, 2013—1 finding
- Oct 11, 2012—6 findings
- Feb 9, 2012—3 findings
- Oct 6, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation of PollockPollock2 harm findings
- Riverbend Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc.Belle Chasse1 harm finding
- Grand Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterLake Charles2 harm findings
- St. Margaret's Daughters HomeNew Orleansno harm findings
- Capital Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLCBaton Rouge5 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction