Deficiency Index

Deerfield Health Care Center

Urbandale, Iowa · CCN 165557

24 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
73
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
30
Ownership
Non profit - Church related
Chain
IMMANUEL
County
Polk
Medicare-certified since
2005

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=14, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 2, 2026

130 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.313.76
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.59—
Annual nurse turnover25.8%40.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 73 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Deerfield Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF757Dec 15, 2022

    Based on observation, clinical record review, hospital record review, facility record review, staff interview, the facility failed to respond appropriately to an INR level below the target range for treatment for one resident reviewed and failed to appropriately monitor another resident's PT/INR as directed by the physician as a means to assure individual therapeutic levels. (Resident #1 and Resident #4) The facility identified a census of 22 residents. Findings include: 1. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment form dated 10/10/22 for Resident #1 documented diagnoses that included: systolic and diastolic heart failure (HF), abnormal anti-coagulant profile, atrial fibrillation (AF), respiratory failure with hypoxia and a duodenal ulcer with perforation and hemorrhage. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 14, 2022

    Based on observations, record review, interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to complete a safety and skin assessments and failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a burn for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for supervision (Resident #1). Resident #1 required assistance of one staff for eating. Staff left Resident #1 unsupervised with a hot cup of coffee and Resident #1 sustained second degree [CONDITION(S)] on her thighs. The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating in intact cognitive ability. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Oct 7, 2021

    Based on observations, facility record review, review of guidance from the Center for Disease Control (CDC), and staff interviews, staff failed to follow CDC guidelines for appropriate personal protective equipment in a medical facility by not wearing goggles while performing resident cares when county is considered high risk. The facility also failed to screen visitors for COVID-19 immediately upon entrance to the facility. The facility reported a census of 23 residents. Findings Include: 1. On 10/4/21 at 10:27 AM, the survey team entered the facility by the skilled nursing entrance. Upon entrance, staff took the team through the skilled nursing unit, to a room to place belongings and then to the front entrance to complete screening for COVID-19. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF678Oct 7, 2021

    Based on personnel file reviews, facility record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on duty at all times for six of 23 residents who requested CPR in a life threatening emergency (Residents #16, #73, #74, #76, #77, and #125). The facility reported a census of 23. Findings include: The documents entitled Iowa Physician order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of Nursing Schedules from [DATE] to [DATE] and staff CPR Certification records revealed the facility failed to have CPR certified staff on duty on the following dates and shifts: a. [DATE] - 10 PM to 6 AM shift; b. [DATE] - 10 PM to 6 AM shift; c. [DATE] - 6 AM to 2 PM shift; d. [DATE] - 10 PM to 6 AM shift; e. [DATE] - 10 PM to 6 AM shift; f. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Jul 2, 2026

    Based on clinical record review, hospital record review, internal incident investigation documentation, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to adapt safety interventions in response to cognitive changes for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Res #1). The facility reported a census of 23 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Res #1 dated 9/11/25 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment (possible score of 0-15).The MDS of Res #1 dated 12/10/25 identified a BIMS score of 11/15.The MDS of Res #1 dated 3/10/26 identified a BIMS score of 10/15, a continued trend of lower scoring, indicating worsening cognitive impairment.The Comprehensive Care Plan of Res #1 identified a Focus Area of Impaired… […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 73 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 2, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 27, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Apr 25, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Jun 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 15, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 14, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 7, 2021Standard4 findings
  • May 12, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • Feb 13, 2020Standard3 findings
  • Jan 19, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Aug 2, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 26, 2018Complaint5 findings
  • Oct 19, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Sep 15, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Mar 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 20, 2015Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 19, 2015Standard8 findings
  • Jun 19, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • May 6, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 13, 2014—1 finding
  • Jan 13, 2014—4 findings
  • Oct 4, 2012—2 findings
  • Oct 4, 2011—5 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 15, 2011—2 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction