Decatur Medical Lodge
Decatur, Texas · CCN 676209
26 surveys since 2015, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 70
- Surveys
- 26
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 124
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PRIORITY MANAGEMENT
- County
- Wise
- Medicare-certified since
- 2009
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Apr 28, 2026
195 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.06 | 3.25 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.22 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 71.3% | 54.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J13.4% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1551.7% | E1241.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C13.4% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8052×
Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
- F9252×
Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Decatur Medical Lodge, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF684Aug 24, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the resident's choices for four (Residents #8, #9, #7, and #3) of ten residents reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 did not develop blisters which then worsened to open sores on her back after she was left in a geri-chair for an extended period of time without a barrier between her and the chair. The facility also failed to ensure the correct treatment was applied to Resident #8's blisters on her back when they transitioned to open sores. 2. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF686Aug 24, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for five (Residents #1, #2, #6, #4, and #10) of ten residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. 1. The facility failed to follow Resident #1's treatment orders and care plan to ensure that new wounds did not develop and previously identified wounds did not worsen. 2. The facility failed to follow Resident #2's treatment orders and care plan to ensure that a dressing and treatment was applied to her wound. 3. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 11, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free of accident and hazards as was possible for one resident (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Driver C failed to follow proper safety measures in securing Resident #1 in the van while driving the resident. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was determined to have existed from [DATE] through [DATE]. The IJ was removed on [DATE] because the facility implemented actions that corrected the non-compliance prior to the beginning of the survey. This failure placed residents at risk of severe injury or death. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]
- Actual harm, patternF600Aug 24, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect for two (Resident #7 and Resident #8) of five residents were reviewed for neglect. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 was not left in a geri-chair for an extended period of time which resulted in her developing blisters. The facility also failed to notify and obtain orders for treatment of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 utilized a leg strap to decrease the tension from his indwelling foley catheter after it had to be surgically placed from when it was pulled out on 06/29/22. These failures placed residents at risk of abuse, neglect, decline in health, and being displaced or hospitalized . […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF690Aug 24, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate treatment and services for one (Resident #7) of one residents observed for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 had a catheter strap to his leg after his catheter was dislodged on 06/29/22 resulting in him needing surgical intervention to implant it into his penis. This failure could place residents at risk for urethral tears, dislodging of the catheter, and urinary tract infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #7's face sheet, dated 08/06/22, reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 70 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 28, 2026Standard7 findings
- Jun 25, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 6, 2025Standard5 findings
- May 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 17, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Dec 14, 2023Standard5 findings
- Nov 29, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Oct 11, 2023Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
Show the 18 earlier surveys
- Aug 29, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Oct 26, 2022Standard1 finding
- Aug 24, 2022Complaint7 findings · 4 harm
- Mar 16, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Dec 2, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Sep 2, 2021Standard5 findings
- Sep 10, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Sep 16, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jun 20, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 12, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jun 15, 2018Standard1 finding
- Mar 20, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jul 10, 2017Complaint3 findings
- May 18, 2017Standard and complaint7 findings
- Feb 2, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 24, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Apr 1, 2016Standard4 findings
- Apr 3, 2015Standard2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction