Crowne Health Care of Mobile
Mobile, Alabama · CCN 015100
11 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 37
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 148
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CROWNE HEALTH CARE
- County
- Mobile
- Medicare-certified since
- 1974
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Sep 19, 2019
2,608 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.95 | 3.81 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.68 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 25.7% | 47.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D787.5% | E— | F112.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Crowne Health Care of Mobile, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 27, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, the 2022 United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, and the facility's policies for DISH SCRAPING and Personal Hygiene Training, the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination by allowing the following:drainage pipes from the prep sink, the three-compartment sink, and the dishwashing machine to extend into the floor drains, insulated coffee cups with stain build-up to be used for service to residents, andmale staff with facial hair to work in the kitchen on 08/25/2026 without facial hair restraints. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the facility's kitchen, 123 of 123 residents. Findings Include: 1. The 2022 U.S. FDA Food Code included: . 5-402.11 Backflow Prevention. (A) . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Aug 27, 2026
Based on a test tray observation, Resident Council Meeting, interviews, and the facility's policy for Conducting Test Trays, the facility failed to ensure Ground Beef and Spanish [NAME] entree served for lunch on 08/26/2026 was at an appetizing temperature. This had the potential to affect all residents served a Mechanical Soft Diet, 36 of 123 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings Included: An undated facility's policy for Conducting Test Trays, included the following; . POLICY: Test trays will be completed .PURPOSE: To assure meal trays are delivered to residents in a timely manner, assuring food is at the proper temperature and quality when it is served to the patient . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF644Aug 27, 2026
Based on interview, record review, and review of the Alabama Department of Mental Health Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I Screening and Determination documentation, the facility failed to ensure compliance with PASARR requirements for Resident Identifier (RI) #16 by failing to ensure completion of the required PASARR Level II Evaluation. RI #16 had a diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia. Despite the Level I screening dated 11/05/2025 identifying the need for a Level II Evaluation, the required evaluation was not completed. The facility's failure to ensure completion of the required PASRR Level II Evaluation affected RI #16, one of three residents reviewed for PASARR compliance. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Aug 27, 2026
Based on observation, interviews, a facility policy titled, Medication Storage, Storage of Medications and Biologicalsthe facility failed to ensure expired medications were not stored in the Unit Two medication storage room and Unit Two Medication Cart One. This deficient practice was evidenced by 11 expired medications identified in the Unit Two medication storage room and one expired medication identified on Unit Two's medication cart one.The medications included:One bottle of Lactulose (also known as Enulose) with an expiration date of 07/20/2026 and opened date of 08/2023;10 bottles of Enulose with expiration dates ranging from 06/2025 through 12/2025;One tube of Triamcinolone Acetate with an expiration date of 12/2025. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Aug 27, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facilities policies titled, Glucometer Disinfection, Medication Administration, and Hand Hygiene Policy and Procedure, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were followed during resident care on 08/24/2026 and during medication administration pass on 08/26/2026.Specifically: 1) The facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #40's oxygen humidifier water bottle was maintained in a sanitary condition. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 37 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 27, 2026Standard5 findings
- Sep 19, 2019Standard and complaint4 findings
- Aug 16, 2018Standard3 findings
- Feb 15, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jun 22, 2017Standard1 finding
- Jun 16, 2016Standard5 findings
- May 21, 2015Standard1 finding
- Aug 21, 2014Standard and complaint5 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- Sep 18, 2013—6 findings
- Sep 20, 2012—4 findings
- Aug 18, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction