Deficiency Index

Crescent City Care Center

Crescent City, California · CCN 056296

38 surveys since 2011, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
229
Surveys
38
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse7

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file27/38

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
99
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
DAVID JOHNSON
County
Del Norte · rural
Medicare-certified since
1971
Ownership changed
In the last 12 months

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jul 29, 2026

103 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.534.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.23—
Annual nurse turnover68.7%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$144,866 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1
Special focus
SFF Candidate

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG11.1%H22.1%I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3031.6%E4749.5%F1515.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 95 of the 229 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6094×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6924×

    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

  • F7614×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8124×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Crescent City Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, patternF689Jun 21, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 28 and Resident 15) and one discharged resident (Resident 233) who were at risk for falls and had a history of falls, were provided with supervision by direct care staff, and had effective revisions and implementation of their nursing care plans to prevent further falls to keep them safe. Facility policies on safety and management of falls were not followed. As a result, Resident 28, Resident 15 & Resident 233 suffered falls with major injuries at the facility. This may have contributed to Resident 233's death, and Resident 28's dramatic decline, as she is now expected to pass away within 6 months. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF692Jun 21, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services related to significant and/or severe weight loss or gain for five out of 23 sampled residents (Resident 12, 20, 25, 29 and 227) to ensure the residents maintained an acceptable nutritional status because: 1. The RD (Registered Dietician) was making quarterly visits (once every three months), which led to minimal in person resident assessments, 2. The RD failed to fully tailor the resident's nutritional interventions to the resident's needs and monitor the continued relevance of those interventions such as residents' functional factors and lack of adequate assistance or supervision during meals, 3. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF835Jun 21, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's Administrator failed to ensure effective oversight and necessary resources to ensure the residents' quality of care, safety, dignity, and dietary services, which include maintenance of the resident's nutrition and hydration were met to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for all 81 residents when: 1. The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Committee, whose members included the Administrator did not make sure an action plan was implemented to reduce the number of falls in the facility and promote a resident safety plan by monitoring trends and implementing changes through careful analysis of the falls, which led to 134 falls from January 2024 through May 2024. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF695Mar 27, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring oxygen were provided humidifiers (bottled water that attaches to an oxygen concentrator and moistens the oxygen, preventing dry nose and throat), clean concentrators (a medical device that provides supplemental oxygen to people with breathing-related conditions by pulling in ambient air, filtering out nitrogen, and delivering purified oxygen) and orders for therapy for 13 of 15 residents (Residents: #18, #20, #23, #22, #25, #31, #40, #41, #98, #48, #55, #76, #81) observed receiving oxygen therapy when thirteen residents did not have humidifiers in use as required for their oxygen delivery systems, seven residents had visibly soiled or dirty oxygen concentrator filters, and eleven… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Mar 27, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, staffing was not sufficient to meet the needs of thirteen Sampled Residents (Resident #6, Resident #29, Resident #55, Resident #9, Resident # 35, Resident #86, Resident #53, Resident #3, Resident # 34, Resident 54, Resident 81, Resident #5, and Resident #67 when:There was no staff assistance with dining for Sampled Residents #9, #86 and #35 and resulted in no lunch eaten by all three residents; and Sampled Resident #86 was not turned every two hours. Staff did not provide activities of preference for Sampled Resident #34, did not provide nail care for Residents #6, #29. […]

Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 229 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 26, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 29, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 1, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 23, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 27, 2026Standard23 findings
  • Feb 25, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • May 1, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 13, 2025Complaint1 finding
Show the 30 earlier surveys
  • Dec 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 21, 2024Standard30 findings · 3 harm
  • Mar 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 21, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 1, 2022Standard21 findings
  • Feb 10, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • May 12, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 11, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 8, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • May 14, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 23, 2019Standard13 findings
  • Sep 10, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 15, 2018Standard10 findings
  • Sep 21, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 12, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 31, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 16, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 6, 2017Standard19 findings
  • Apr 10, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 31, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 14, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Oct 16, 2015Standard10 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 17, 2014Standard17 findings
  • Feb 27, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 31, 2013—16 findings
  • Aug 21, 2013Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 20, 2013—3 findings
  • Oct 16, 2012—5 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 17, 2012—12 findings
  • Jul 1, 2011—11 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction