Deficiency Index

Creekside Post Acute

Yucaipa, California · CCN 055557

61 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
193
Surveys
61
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file53/61

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
59
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ROCKWELL HEALTHCARE
County
San Bernardino
Medicare-certified since
1976

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jul 15, 2026

117 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day6.284.36
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.77—
Annual nurse turnover55.6%36.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2266.7%E721.2%F412.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 33 of the 193 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F7553×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

  • F7613×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6922×

    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Creekside Post Acute, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Jul 18, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff who had appropriate competencies and skill set completed the resident's Quarterly Nutrition Assessment (a detailed evaluation of eating habits, weight and overall health related to food, done every 3 months). This failure had the potential to place 52 highly vulnerable residents' health at risk due to not receiving an adequate nutritional assessment.During a review of Residents 5, 8, 25 and 26's Quarterly Nutrition Assessments (comprehensive evaluation of an individual's nutritional status, aiming to identify any nutritional deficiencies or risks, and guide personalized interventions) between November 2024, through June 2025, it indicated the assessments were completed and signed by the Dietary Service Supervisor… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 18, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store resident food safely when:1.The resident refrigerator had multiple food items that were not labeled or dated. 2. The temperature of the refrigerator had not been monitored in June 2025 and July 2025. These failures had the potential for food borne illness (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods) in 25 medically compromised residents who were able to store food in this refrigerator.During a concurrent observation and interview on July 16, 2025, at 9:57 AM, with the Social Worker (SW), in the dining room, the resident refrigerator was found to have multiple food items that were not labeled or dated. Two thermometers were located outside of the fridge. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 17, 2022

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent entry of outside contaminants into the bulk container of thickener (a starch added to liquids and foods to make it firmer). This failure had the potential to cause contamination of food prepared with thickener, and possible foodborne illness in 47 of 48 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on March 14, 2022, at 8:26 AM, with the Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS), in the kitchen, the bulk container of thickener had multiple dark crumbs mixed in with the white thickener. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF814Mar 17, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not properly dispose of trash when the outside garbage bin for trash was overflowing, and the lid was not closed for one of one dumpster. This failure had the potential to attract vermin (pests or nuisance animals that spread diseases) in a facility that cares for 48 medically compromised residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on March 14, 2022, at 10:43 AM, with the Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS), in the outdoor garbage storage area, the trash dumpster was overflowing with garbage, and the lids were not closed. The DSS stated that the trash should not be overflowing, and the lids should be closed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF886Jan 13, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly prevent and/or contain COVID-19 when three out of three sampled staff members (LVN 1, CNA 1, & CNA 2) were not subjected to routine COVID-19 testing, according to the facility's residing County of San Bernardino's COVID-19 positivity rate. This failure had the potential for resident harm and/or death for 36 out of 48 vulnerable residents in the facility not previously affected by COVID-19, as the non-adherence to routine COVID-19 testing of facility staff members, per San Bernardino County's COVID-19 positivity rate, failed to ensure consistent infection surveillance to prevent and/or mitigate incidences of COVID-19 outbreaks in the facility. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 193 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 15, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 24, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 28, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 18, 2025Standard12 findings
  • Jun 7, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Mar 11, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 31, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 53 earlier surveys
  • May 25, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 25, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 17, 2022Standard11 findings
  • Feb 2, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 22, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 28, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 12, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 30, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 9, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 17, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 13, 2021Infection control2 findings
  • Oct 21, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 17, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 29, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 27, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 12, 2019Standard19 findings
  • Jul 18, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 20, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 12, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 7, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 18, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 29, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 20, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 17, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 13, 2018Standard8 findings
  • May 24, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 24, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 17, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 1, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 19, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 7, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 6, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 16, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 27, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Jun 2, 2017Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • May 24, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 14, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 10, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 1, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 22, 2016Standard14 findings
  • May 5, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 29, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 24, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 6, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 21, 2015Standard8 findings
  • Oct 14, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 6, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 29, 2014Standard12 findings
  • Dec 16, 2013—1 finding
  • Nov 7, 2013—8 findings
  • Oct 10, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 2, 2012—13 findings
  • Dec 19, 2011—12 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction